SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Intel Corporation (INTC)
An SI Board Since October 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
186894 739 0 INTC
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
186269Blink, blink Tri Gate, EUV, 450mm - Apple would have access to all the good stufetchmeister-5/26/2011
186268Intel might make chips based on non-Intel cores 9:17 am ET 05/26/2011 - Reuters Road Walker-5/26/2011
186267TSMC Completed “The Analysis of the Effect of High Speed Rail Vibration on IC Faetchmeister-5/25/2011
186266I wonder what kind of margins Samsungs can achieve making the A5 for Apple Risinetchmeister-5/25/2011
186265Intel to offer Cedar Trail CPUs with prices 30-50% less than existing Atom CPUs etchmeister-5/25/2011
186264Intel Creates AppUp Small Business Service on Hybrid Cloud finance.yahoo.com InJakeStraw-5/24/2011
186263No more so than at previous nodes. Seismically unstable doesn't mean there&#gugie-5/20/2011
186262Hi Etch, That is an interesting table. I didn't realize that Freescale wasrobert b furman-5/20/2011
186261<i>The seismic risk has always been huge for semiconductor manufacturing, etchmeister-5/20/2011
186260<i>Where did you see mention of 450mm?</i> Apple would probably theetchmeister-5/20/2011
186259check out table 2; Intel matches BRCM and outperforms QCOM oh yeah $20 target eetchmeister15/19/2011
186258Good point. Covello's track record on calls is horrible and has a habit of robert b furman-5/19/2011
186257For what it's worth I'll throw in the fact that Goldman also downgraded John Koligman-5/19/2011
186256<i>Pretty weird</i> It's hard to write something (new) up thatetchmeister-5/19/2011
186255I'm all about value and never been about MOMO. Bobrobert b furman-5/19/2011
186254Bob, thank you very much for the INTC pdf! Very encouraging. I downloaded it butGottfried-5/19/2011
186253ROTF. AMEN brother!! It really shows to me they want the stock and were behindrobert b furman-5/19/2011
186252GS evaluating INTC is like Arnold S. preaching family valuesGottfried15/19/2011
186251Exactomundorobert b furman-5/19/2011
186250GS will then issue an aggressive buy rating next month and a target price of $30JakeStraw-5/19/2011
186249This is proof GS has been caught net short. They need retail to be net sellers robert b furman-5/19/2011
186248Now you know why they are an evil force, as this "Sell" recommendationalpine_climber-5/19/2011
186247bloomberg.com Downgrade to "sell", lowered target from 21 to 20. Pretdr_elis15/19/2011
186246<i> Where did you see mention of 450mm? </i> No - it's not mentetchmeister-5/18/2011
186245Where did you see mention of 450mm?Elmer Phud-5/18/2011
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News