SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
18633Doesn't seem like you did.Bill-7/31/2002
18632Wow, how interesting to read it that way.Bill-7/31/2002
18631Most banks are white-owned. I see no problem with a black-owned bank. It's Poet-7/31/2002
18630you figure it out... <b>Largest White-Owned Bank Created </b> 07/3MulhollandDrive-7/31/2002
18629How is that racism? Because it's black-owned?Poet-7/31/2002
18628See my last post to you. I meant it.Poet-7/31/2002
18627:) lol... do i get a gold star?MulhollandDrive-7/31/2002
18626You don't say? :-)$Bill-7/31/2002
18625yellow and blue make green$$$$... :)MulhollandDrive-7/31/2002
18624I'm putting my money in the Yellow Bank, but only after it merges with the BBill-7/31/2002
18623Can't we all just get along.....????? --Rodney Allen......<g>jlallen-7/31/2002
18622You already did. If you don't like nasty snippets, stop snipping nastily.Bill-7/31/2002
18621speaking of racism.... <i><b>Largest Black-Owned Bank Created <MulhollandDrive-7/31/2002
18620I'm tired of this, Bill. I'll be happy to talk to you when this is overPoet-7/31/2002
18619Only for the shameful, Poet.Bill-7/31/2002
18618Any idea what's up with the Saudis? hindustantimes.com <i>Prince FahTigerPaw-7/31/2002
18617That's a shame, Bill.Poet-7/31/2002
18616I've seen some interesting slants and adjectives in AP stories lately, so I&Bill-7/31/2002
18615I wouldn't hold my breath.Bill-7/31/2002
18614The story's an old one. Hashed and rehashed since 1999. 11 out of 43 were coBill-7/31/2002
18613Just wanted to note that I have lurked, but had a lot of correspondence to deal Neocon-7/31/2002
18612<i>Was hoping you'd weigh in on this one...</i> I have been folLane3-7/31/2002
18611Thank you so much. I have Andrew Sullivan bookmarked already. I'll look thPoet-7/31/2002
18610It's an opinion piece. Just like the opinion pieces on the WSJ editorial paOriginal Mad Dog-7/31/2002
18609Charley is the expert on blogs. Here are some I have bookmarked. I got most ofLane3-7/31/2002
18608I think it makes sense to identify the political leanings of journalists when thBill-7/31/2002
18607I agree with your observation, OMD, and hope that it leads to a vitriol-free disPoet-7/31/2002
18606Message 17817953Original Mad Dog-7/31/2002
18605You do not judge someone on the basis of one fact or fault. Taking Fatboy Kennejlallen-7/31/2002
18604Aren't all men shameful? <g>Original Mad Dog-7/31/2002
18603I'll reply later: big day today. I'm sorry for calling you a "shamE-7/31/2002
18602Today I noticed you posted more material. Of course, I reviewed all that yesterdBill-7/31/2002
18601Coleman has not earned my trust. But he wasn't the only person involved.Bill-7/31/2002
18600From what I can tell, based on reading about two dozen news accounts, a handful Bill-7/31/2002
18599An observation: I have joked with Laz on occasion about his use of labels to clOriginal Mad Dog-7/31/2002
18598I'm not getting you. Your reply doesn't seem to relate to my post.Bill-7/31/2002
18597I posted a great deal more than a column by a NYT liberal.E-7/31/2002
18596<i>until they prove otherwise. </i> If Coleman has earned your trusE-7/31/2002
18595Bill, I had not heard of that issue before E posted that. I am skeptical of soOriginal Mad Dog-7/31/2002
18594Unbelievable. Absolutely unbelievable. You shameful man.E-7/31/2002
18593LOLE-7/31/2002
18592Was hoping you'd weigh in on this one... Message 17808000Bill-7/31/2002
18591E initiated this topic by posting a column from a NYT liberal. I researched the Bill-7/31/2002
18590That's the second piece I've seen on weblogs in a week. Where are these Poet-7/31/2002
18589No dear, I didn't attack you. I made a comment to E that I wouldn't holPoet-7/31/2002
18588How Weblogs Keep the Media Honest By Howard Kurtz Washington Post Staff Writer Lane3-7/31/2002
18587You attacked me. I never even mentioned you. I deal in facts. If you can find mBill-7/31/2002
18586I wish you'd cool it on the attacks, Bill. And by the way, nasty little snipPoet-7/31/2002
18585<I><< I wouldn't hold my breath. >></I> What a nastBill-7/31/2002
18584I didn't dismiss the racial claims. I just couldn't find a reference to Bill-7/31/2002
18583They had no responsibility for ruining their own lives? He just picked them out Bill-7/31/2002
18582I just didn't draw any conclusions on the police officer's character, liBill-7/31/2002
18581As a matter of fact, I do have some experience there. You obviously don't. Bill-7/31/2002
18580The Black Hawk Down battle was waged in April 1993 under Clinton's watch. 18Bill-7/31/2002
18579Let's try this again: You want to blame Bush for the market crash? Great! TLazarus_Long-7/31/2002
18578You want to blame Bush for the market crash? Great! Then I get to blame BubbleLazarus_Long-7/31/2002
18577I meant to post this here for the fun of it but was dropping by over at GWB and E-7/31/2002
18576<i>Everybody does it</i> True, but not everybody is subject to a 40 TigerPaw-7/30/2002
18575Some more details, while I'm waiting...excerpts.... TULIA - In the early moE-7/30/2002
18574I wouldn't hold my breath. -g AI was a lot of fun tonight. Not as much infPoet-7/30/2002
18573That's perfect. And it would be a fitting punishment for those pushers who sE-7/30/2002
18572After serious consideration, I'd suggest a spanking with a spackle knife.Poet-7/30/2002
18571What do you think the punishment should be for possession of powdered drywall? IE-7/30/2002
18570Drywall! You never disappoint with your research, E.Poet-7/30/2002
18569I'm helping you in your tireless investigation of the evidence! Here's E-7/30/2002
18568Monk is an offbeat detective. Campy. Well, weird, actually. The show has seveLane3-7/30/2002
18567I've never even heard of Monk or Stargate SG1, but I do have the VCR set up E-7/30/2002
18566You posted this: <i>"The arrests were made solely on the word of thiE-7/30/2002
18565Oh, there's ever so much material on the man whose case you certainly do appE-7/30/2002
18564<<I've gotten hooked on Monk-->> He's neat.Ish-7/30/2002
18563Don't go getting sarcastic on me. I think he has always tried to do the righIsh-7/30/2002
18562I've gotten hooked on Monk--one of the few TV shows I "watch" withLane3-7/30/2002
18561I find your defense of the conduct in this case fascinating and surprising, baseE-7/30/2002
18560<i>Funniest is Steve's word count excuse.</i> You've certaiDayuhan-7/30/2002
18559<i> How do you grind it? Could you just put it in a pepper mill? </i>Dayuhan-7/30/2002
18558Here are the two sentences as quoted: <i> "These people ran on responDayuhan-7/30/2002
18557Yep, he was smart, all right, and "stayed within the law," as that artE-7/30/2002
18556Arianna Huffington, whom I like a lot, has some information and insights about tE-7/30/2002
18555<I>If any of these are misstatements, I'd be relieved to hear it: &quBill-7/30/2002
18554I like Cheney. He's stayed within the law. Damn smart guy too. Knows his stuIsh-7/30/2002
18553Fascinating piece. Coleman isn't the only one. Recent Exoneration in Tulia,E-7/30/2002
18552If crimes were committed, people should go to jail, and no one here said otherwiE-7/30/2002
18551Hmmm, you seem to have changed the subject to an entirely new one: whether you wE-7/30/2002
18550<<The fact was that Kennedy drinks too much, is a womanizer, and behaved wIsh-7/30/2002
18549I don't know Everybody Loves Raymond (though I know who the star is of it) oE-7/30/2002
18548<<"The victim Joslin then took the gun out of Stoker's mouth, sayIsh-7/30/2002
18547I merely pointed out a fact and asked a question: The fact was that Kennedy driE-7/30/2002
18546lol! you never disappoint, bill. :)MulhollandDrive-7/30/2002
18545Interesting.Poet-7/30/2002
18544Cool. Later...Bill-7/30/2002
18543A quick search reveals this to be big and on-going news among the drug law crowdBill-7/30/2002
18542I am going to take care of some things. I hope to be back today, but cannot say Neocon-7/30/2002
18541ROFL! I hope you accept all of me. <B>All Of Me</B> Words and MusiPoet-7/30/2002
18540I'll accept your capitulation then....<g>jlallen-7/30/2002
18539E answered this post to me very well. There's nothing I can add.Poet-7/30/2002
18538I'm a Law and Order groupie (like Fran Liebowitz, the photographer). I watcPoet-7/30/2002
18537<i>C'mon, Karen, you've got to admit this post of yours is funny:&Lane3-7/30/2002
18536<I>It's one reason I oppose the death penalty. The system is too vulnePoet-7/30/2002
18535C'mon, Karen, you've got to admit this post of yours is funny: <i>Bill-7/30/2002
18534<i>You take yourself entirely too seriously.... </i> Oh, my, did I Lane3-7/30/2002
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):