SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
PERFUMANIA.COM . . PRFM . . .FOR LONGS ONLY
An SI Board Since December 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2489 10 0 PRFM
Emcee:  Rande Is Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1864 <First the longs get creamed with a CFO resignation for the site openinSEAN007-2/2/1999
1863 <I want to se it at 15 one more time....cmon ...lets go> 15 would be a br007-2/2/1999
1862 I want to squeeze it myself..... I want to se it at 15 one more time....cmon ..Anthony@Pacific-2/2/1999
1861 Not believing me has proved fatal to way too many people just ask around..Im nAnthony@Pacific-2/2/1999
1860 <i want to be short 250,000 shares of this...> If I believed you for a se007-2/2/1999
1859 PRFM<-------$60 paid advertising on MSFT....LEADS TO FRAUDULENT PRESS RELEASAnthony@Pacific-2/2/1999
1858 <It was so predictable.> Oh, then you must have covered and gone long in 007-2/2/1999
1857 The partnership release came out at 3:09PM ET, hence the jump right around thatOleg Sogolov-2/2/1999
1856 Good work LLOYD..I cannot even talk abouty it anymore its just too funny..aI aAnthony@Pacific-2/2/1999
1855 I couldn't have said it better, Lloyd. So called partnerships with MicrosofOleg Sogolov-2/2/1999
1854 Hello Lloyd, Base on what you are saying, this thing should be in the pennies.KENNETH DOAN-2/2/1999
1853 <This fat pig of a stock..has gotten on my nerves and I intend on trading it007-2/2/1999
1852 A liitle light can be shed by knowing that THEY also handle CFON,, and by the wAnthony@Pacific-2/2/1999
1851 Jose its not that he doesnt need to reply..its just that he cant reply..see he Anthony@Pacific-2/2/1999
1850 The CFO didn't "jump ship", instead he got thrown overboard. He 007-2/2/1999
1849 Yes, i saw where prfm paid the obligatory fee to have a small link on mfn sidelloyd bashaw-2/2/1999
1848 lloyd did you see where microsoft partnered with PRFM today??!!!unclewest-2/2/1999
1847 007: Did u see where the CFO jumped ship? lloyd bashaw-2/2/1999
1846 Nice post Frederick! I especially like #6 and #7. The shorts that follow Antho007-2/2/1999
1845 what do you mean modest profit? Didn't you tell us all that you added sometSteven Finkel-2/2/1999
1844 To Whom it May Concern: 1. Become familiar with the laws of SI. Don't leFrederick Langford-2/2/1999
1843 So Bill, you're not here to HYPE right? How about that little rumor your tJose Matos-2/2/1999
1842 Bill: Did you hear that the CFO of PRFM jumped ship? lloyd bashaw-2/2/1999
1841 Lloyd are you achimminny on #daytraders because that person posted your exact cBill Rood-2/2/1999
1840 please, i need advice and help, i have no idea what im doing....i bought PRFM ojeer-2/2/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):