SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
CHPS
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2740 1 0 CHPS
Emcee:  JPK Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1865 You are probably right. I believe the Fed is focused on unemployment and over Brewmeister-5/20/1997
1864 Paul & All, IMO, if he does 1/2 today, he may skip July. If he does 1/4 toTom M-5/20/1997
1863 Paul and all--I look for no change in the rate. However I think that will havDruss-5/20/1997
1862 Dan, I think 1/2 percent is a little harsh. I think it will just be 1/4.Paul Schmidt-5/19/1997
1861 Scott, Yes, the pressure is on the big corps. to offer more because of all theRosemary-5/19/1997
1860 Dan 1/2% seems a little high in light of last indicators. On what, do you baseRobert Ching-5/19/1997
1859 My 2 cents - Greenspan pushes rates up 1/2 percent!Brewmeister-5/19/1997
1858 If he doesn't, there will be irrational exuberance in light of the new budgScott Moore-5/19/1997
1857 Scott, So what's your thinking, do you think he'll raise them?Rosemary-5/19/1997
1856 Yep, but CHPS and SIII being beaten down already shouldn't give much groundScott Moore-5/19/1997
1855 So what's our thinking? Do you think the Feds will raise rates?Rosemary-5/18/1997
1854 Ray, Keep in mind, its high risk. Thanks for the tips, I'll look them up.Rosemary-5/17/1997
1853 Rosemary, I will definately check out SPAZ. I'm a CHPS holder @10. You alsray c-5/17/1997
1852 Dale, Even though it doesn't show it, the money flow is still on a positivRosemary-5/14/1997
1851 Rosemary: From your past posts I gather that you follow the technical aspeDBen-5/14/1997
1850 Paul, Hear, Hear, well said. As I have said in an earlier post, I've beenRosemary-5/14/1997
1849 Missing, I am with Rosemary. I think anyone who buys in at these levels will bePaul Schmidt-5/14/1997
1848 There are many reasons for CHPS fall -- but primary among them, in my view, is Trippi-5/14/1997
1847 probably because it is a DOG. Still in there but sick of itGabe Fernandez-5/14/1997
1846 Missing, We are coming into the dulldrums of summer and the FOMC meeting may mRosemary-5/14/1997
1845 For everyone to comment on. Currently I am thinking of buying couple os beaten missing-5/13/1997
1844 To: All Sorry about the typo in the link! worth.comDBen-5/13/1997
1843 Trippi, Thanks for the good wishes. Stuart C P.S. No change in First Call txgin-5/13/1997
1842 To: All: Worth Mag. artical on the net: worth.com March issue. A little old anDBen-5/13/1997
1841 Stuart -- sorry u had to sell -- hope things work out for you -- and CHPS shareTrippi-5/12/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News