SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Intel Corporation (INTC)
An SI Board Since October 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
186894 739 0 INTC
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
186669Intel reaffirms socketed CPU support for the “forseeable future” Intel refuteTimF-12/6/2012
186668TECHNOLOGYDecember 6, 2012, 7:00 p.m. ET AMD Pays Globalfoundries to Reduce PurcE_K_S-12/6/2012
186667Not sure I agree.... Intel's process and manufacturing expertise is valuableKirk ©-12/6/2012
186666Elmer, That's a very good question and I don't know. Further, if disclgreg s-12/6/2012
186665Speaking of suppliers, any thoughts on who else other than Taiwan Semi might be Elmer Phud-12/6/2012
186664Greg At what point does that become material and require disclosure?Elmer Phud-12/6/2012
186663Thanks Elmer. I brought it up because I've read stuff over the years about John Koligman-12/6/2012
186662Intel's process and manufacturing expertise is valuable. But it is problemagreg s-12/6/2012
186661I wonder longer term though, what this might do to Intel's margins if more oElmer Phud-12/6/2012
186660I agree that AAPL is a prime possibility here with the company feeling some heatJohn Koligman-12/6/2012
186659I could see that for Nvidia or anyone in the US getting chips made in China. I Kirk ©-12/6/2012
186658I don't recall it ever being brought out as a line itme... but I know from mKirk ©-12/6/2012
186657Kirk Here's another thought. Pure speculation on my part. Nvidia wants InElmer Phud-12/6/2012
186656I am not surprised and have said for awhile I thought they would eventually do iKirk ©-12/6/2012
186655EKS, interesting post. I'll refrain from further comments on this matter becGottfried112/6/2012
186654Still positive for both companies and could lead to "good" press if thE_K_S-12/6/2012
186653EP, It's not the first time analysts have been late to the party. If histogreg s-12/6/2012
186652greg What surprises me is the complete lack of realization on the part of analyElmer Phud112/6/2012
186651<i>If they did a deal, how would it be structured? Would it be a muti yeaRoad Walker-12/6/2012
186650If they did a deal, how would it be structured? Would it be a muti year commitmE_K_S-12/6/2012
186649<i>And our foundry customers aren’t going to announce that they’ve moved Road Walker-12/6/2012
186648Yes, the foundry confirmation is great. Intel is gradually "peeling back tgreg s-12/6/2012
186647I also found it reassuring that PO basically telegraphed the fact that his replaElmer Phud112/6/2012
186646I also found it reassuring that PO basically telegraphed the fact that his replagreg s-12/6/2012
186645This was posted by Mahmoud on the AMD board. It deserves to be reposted here: IElmer Phud112/6/2012
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):