SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
DCI Telecommunications - DCTC Today
An SI Board Since August 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
19331 48 0 DCTC
Emcee:  Bruce Galpeer Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
18731RR, I wish you no ill will either. However, your suggestions to litigate prematParker Benchley-8/2/2000
18730George, As I wrote to you in PM at first, I wish you no ill. In fact, I have emrrufff-8/2/2000
18729RR, 90% of my post was written in good nature so you miss my real point as IParker Benchley-8/2/2000
18728Unfortunately he did not look at the big picture and which other parties with astonto-8/2/2000
18727OK George I get the picture. You and Remy deserve each other. Good luck.rrufff-8/2/2000
18726<i>Excellent quote -- you are making a lot of sense.</i> *OT thoughParker Benchley-8/2/2000
18725I hope that shareholders will seriously consider your post regarding taking actitonto-8/1/2000
18724Hi Tonto, Excellent quote -- you are making a lot of sense. George -- Remy thrrufff-8/1/2000
18723"Don't underestimate the common man. People are intelligent enough to etonto-8/1/2000
18722Not sure if this has already been posted. An update... sec.govtonto-8/1/2000
18721If it is not yet obvious to you people, all "Semper Fi" EVER appeared valuehunter-8/1/2000
18720Thanks George, Guess we're about to see the test of his true mettle on thatdon denson-8/1/2000
18719Don, A friend e-mailed me these observations. I believe they are good ones as Parker Benchley-8/1/2000
18718Sure looks like..... the Murph wants to get in the face of the SEC (and all of don denson-7/31/2000
18717Today's lovely close. DCTC .14 -.36 ROTI .04 -.01 Nice job boys, nice jParker Benchley-7/31/2000
18716Lou, Reeks is an understatement. What is Murphy and Shatsoff thinking? If thisParker Benchley-7/31/2000
18715All, I forgot to state the last post I made was submitted to me by P.M. <b&gParker Benchley-7/31/2000
18714Hello Everyone, I am out of ROTI. This entire deal reeks. Why was the shell nLT-7/31/2000
18713Quick question from another Bigelow-induced lurker: Do DCTC shareholders have thERM-7/31/2000
18712LT, I received this message privately. It brings up some interesting points. IParker Benchley-7/31/2000
18711This may help clear up some things... ABA Section of Business Law Business Lawtonto-7/30/2000
18710I sincerely doubt that their legal expenses will be paid for by shareholders. TDon Green-7/30/2000
18709Cool, I look forward to hearing from ya.ernie de la fuente-7/29/2000
18708Jack, IMO, Murphy is still fully involved with this entire process no matter whParker Benchley-7/29/2000
18707Jack,, I agree, maybe we will get enough for a good cigar. Now with the meetinEd Pettee-7/28/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):