SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Noise Cancellation Technology (NCTI)
An SI Board Since January 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2775 25 0 NCTI
Emcee:  ronnie scott Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1875 If you dislike reverse splits, how about pushing for a 3 for one split, then weENOTS-3/19/1998
1874 Hi! Im a VERITY (ie they licence NXT) fan from the UK. I stumbled into this tbafe5-3/19/1998
1873 From a couple hundred thousand average daily shares to over 17 Million in one dPaul B. Mackey-3/19/1998
1872 You are correct Gregg. My error. I actually purchased at .92+ after having poPaul B. Mackey-3/19/1998
1871 I am suprised to hear so much talk about a reverse stock split...Didn't we peter gucker-3/19/1998
1870 No offense, Paul, but I was skeptical about your claim so I checked the chart. Greg Thornton-3/18/1998
1869 Anyone want to comment on this from Briefing.com Andrea Electronics (AND) 18 3Tom Caruthers-3/18/1998
1868 ME TOO! altho we have announcement after announcements, and it seems to have leENOTS-3/18/1998
1867 NCTI seems to have support at $1.00 I've carefully watched this stock sincRay Rueb-3/18/1998
1866 Yea! man they are loading up, it is probably trying to average their loss down!ENOTS-3/18/1998
1865 I would be nice to see some positive insider activity instead of this... OOLCubano-3/18/1998
1864 I notice this has a dramatic effect, down 1/64th....ENOTS-3/18/1998
1863 Dr. Moze, I sold at 1.53 what I had purchased at .25. Bought again at .75. I Paul B. Mackey-3/18/1998
1862 Ray, Skepticism noted. I have posted my own analysis based on per unit sales Paul B. Mackey-3/18/1998
1861 RE: Stock buyback A stock buyback will never happen. This would only occur ifRay Rueb-3/18/1998
1860 I understand Greg. I was thinking, though, that once they <i>do</i>halfscot-3/18/1998
1859 I think they have a double wide trailer and a garage some where in Maryland, BuENOTS-3/18/1998
1858 Need cash for stock buyback, right? Reverse-splits are not always bad for a stGreg Thornton-3/18/1998
1857 Wouldn't a stock buyback make more sense than a reverse split? Reverse splhalfscot-3/18/1998
1856 I am brand new to this thread having gotten my secret code number about ninety ssscomp-3/18/1998
1855 Yeah, I think a dip after a reverse would definitely be a buying opp! Of coursDr. Moze-3/18/1998
1854 Sounds like a buying opportunity to me! Even Dr. Moze would agree with this, IGreg Thornton-3/18/1998
1853 Exactly Tom... Reverse splits ONLY WORK FOR COMPANIES THAT HAVE TURNED THE CORRay S.-3/18/1998
1852 Well this should get another 1/32 up tic in the stock, for sure, for sure,.....ENOTS-3/18/1998
1851 Just saw this on the Yahoo thread: M E M O R A N D U M TO: NCTI ShareholHans Reuchlin-3/18/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News