Vari-L (VARL) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Vari-L (VARL)

An SI Board Since May 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
2702	34	0	VARLE

Emcee: JakeStraw	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1877	dodger, I agree & have been preaching patience with VARL for over 3 years!	JakeStraw	-	2/1/2000
1876	FWIW...a couple of observations... It took 3 years to accumulate the first 120	the dodger	-	2/1/2000
1875	Jeff -- Your observations are valid. However, the lack of questions says ther	pat mudge	-	2/1/2000
1874	JS- Thanks again. My outlook has been altered to a certain extent. kirby	The Reaper	-	1/31/2000
1873	**Does each customer have a different configuration of VCO that requires VARL t	J Stone	-	1/31/2000
1872	Pat: My 2 cents, and that's all it may be worth, regarding the conference	J Stone	-	1/31/2000
1871	JS- got it. I thought that VARL would be trying to get long production runs wit	The Reaper	-	1/31/2000
1870	**With demand increasing dramatically, as evidenced by their backlog rising yet	J Stone	-	1/31/2000
1869	You are correct that we should have seen the dilution coming. It was fully disc	akmike	-	1/31/2000
1868	I think if we (and the analysts) were paying attention -- we would have recogni	Labrador	-	1/31/2000
1867	JS- no offense taken, just trying to understand. You're right about my expe	The Reaper	-	1/31/2000
1866	<<Was the 20% dilution a surprise? >> Pat, this is what threw me of	uel_Dave	-	1/31/2000
1865	Jeff -- I hear you and recognize the potential for VARL going forward. Howeve	pat mudge	-	1/31/2000
1864	Kirby, No offense, but you seem to have limited knowledge of how to manage a m	J Stone	-	1/31/2000
1863	I can't agree with the slow, controlled growth assessment. Revenues grew 34	akmike	-	1/31/2000
1862	I agree. Anything less than all out growth plans to maximize the potential of	Mark Oliver	-	1/31/2000
1861	There is no weakening of company financials, but from what I've read about	The Reaper	-	1/31/2000
1860	There is a combination of profit-taking from earlier run-up,expectations which	akmike	-	1/31/2000
1859	akmike or anyone, Do you think that the Street has "voted" re: the q	JBruin	-	1/31/2000
1858	Picked up on the SSPI thread: biz.yahoo.com	pat mudge	-	1/31/2000
1857	Will the company continue to give significant option grants to key employees?	Labrador	-	1/31/2000
1856	Pat-I also just now returned and listened to cc. There is some speculation on o	akmike	-	1/30/2000
1855	I finally took the time to listen to the latest conference call. Under-whelmin	pat mudge	-	1/30/2000
1854	I've been at this investment/trading game a long time. Its important for	mozerd	-	1/29/2000
1853	Vari-L Company Decreases Debt in Move to Strengthen Balance Sheet and Enhance E	JakeStraw	-	1/27/2000

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):