SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
INTEL FOR TECHNICIANS
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1513 9 0 INTC
Emcee:  jmac Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
188 Alec, I think you are right. We should see the bottom by the end of thChristian Atallah-3/12/1997
187 Alec, If 1300 is to work, we have to stay above it, take out 1320 and the verSteelBlueIce-3/12/1997
186 Jerry, do you think we'll see a quick reversal with the NASDAQ composite liAlec Epting-3/12/1997
185 Ugly day in many ways but a few positives- For all intents and purposes the NASteelBlueIce-3/12/1997
184 >TA is working! It's telling you to be neutral, short against the box. &xstuckey-3/11/1997
183 Hi Jay, As I said to X, were kinda in a wait and see purgatory of support andSteelBlueIce-3/11/1997
182 "Now the price has declined for 4 consecutive weeks. The obvious thing thiChristian Atallah-3/11/1997
181 Hi X, TA is working! It's telling you to be neutral, short against the boSteelBlueIce-3/11/1997
180 Hi Jay, I think that if you ran a TA screen on 10,000 stocks, Intel would be onxstuckey-3/11/1997
179 Hello! anybody out there??? I know INTC is treading water and pretty boring -Jay Baca-3/11/1997
178 Christian, I was looking at my INTC chart again - I think you are right aboutJay Baca-3/10/1997
177 IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENTS techstocks.comKashish King-3/10/1997
176 Screening for technical parameters is no different than screening for fundamentJohn K-3/10/1997
175 Christian, While I see the possibility of your scenerio, I think you're SteelBlueIce-3/10/1997
174 I think that you are mistaken on your analysis of intc and the market. Nasdaq cChristian Atallah-3/10/1997
173 Sorry Jay...... I don't think intc is going to be anywhere near 160 for at Christian Atallah-3/10/1997
172 Hi X, A large part of my work as you can tell from my website is support and SteelBlueIce-3/9/1997
171 Hi,Jerry, Traditional TA includes all the stuff that makes TA subjective. Amongxstuckey-3/9/1997
170 jmac, INTC is the NAZ so looking at them is pretty redundant. I guess what I&SteelBlueIce-3/9/1997
169 HI X, The weekly chart is looking <i><b>oversold</i></b&SteelBlueIce-3/9/1997
168 Hi Jerry, Could you explain what strength you see in the weekly chart when the xstuckey-3/9/1997
167 I am not too optomistic for this week so I agree with you. But, INTC has decoujmac-3/9/1997
166 jmac, You're doing the right thing, loosing sleep isn't worth it. HopSteelBlueIce-3/8/1997
165 I agree, but I am in so deep with INTC, I can not afford to add more at 137-14jmac-3/8/1997
164 jmac, I wrote to you about INTC techs on your other thread, you may have missSteelBlueIce-3/8/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News