SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
18833Future not so bright for telecoms, By Kevin Maney The telecommunications industE-8/3/2002
18832If I were to believe TP, Bush would be Omnipotent......Neocon-8/3/2002
18831Don't let the doorknob hit in the butt on the way out.Lazarus_Long-8/2/2002
18830Amen. Good post, Steven.Lazarus_Long-8/2/2002
18829I defininitly don't care for Ish and have made that plain before. TPTigerPaw-8/2/2002
18828If you don't care for the regulars on this thread, you are certainly welcomeLazarus_Long-8/2/2002
18827Some more on me and cops in a case in which I was in the minority. So I think I&E-8/2/2002
18826<i>you never say anything just to be mean. </i> You obviously donTigerPaw-8/2/2002
18825I know that. It's obvious, Ish. Also, you never say anything just to be meanE-8/2/2002
18824<i>back up those reckless libelous slanders </i> I don't know wTigerPaw-8/2/2002
18823Oh, but they did. They just didn't count them the way you wanted them countLazarus_Long-8/2/2002
18822<i>Generally, I give cops the benefit of doubt, until they prove otherwiseE-8/2/2002
18821<i>I just didn't draw any conclusions on the police officer's charE-8/2/2002
18820You perhaps forgot that they didn't count the votes. At the time Katherine TigerPaw-8/2/2002
18819I'll back up what Ish said.Lazarus_Long-8/2/2002
18818Has it slipped your mind that Gore resorted to the courts first? It would appeaLazarus_Long-8/2/2002
18817I have a fault about being 100% honest. I may be wrong but I believe it.Ish-8/2/2002
18816I wasn't even 1% serious! Was just makin' a point. And thanks for the cE-8/2/2002
18815<i>Perhaps it would be expected to have a frequent number of prince deathsLane3-8/2/2002
18814I was hoping you weren't 100% serious. You may lean liberal but you have alwIsh-8/2/2002
18813<i>There are 3,000 to 4,000 Saudi princes (some 30 to 40 new males are borE-8/2/2002
18812<i>Assassinating specific individuals in the Al Qaeda structure ... </iTigerPaw-8/2/2002
18811thirdworldtraveler.com <i>There are 3,000 to 4,000 Saudi princes (some 30TigerPaw-8/2/2002
18810<i>you allege a conspiracy by the top officers of the United States governTigerPaw-8/2/2002
18809<i>That was certainly not a call for assasination of the Saudi Royal familTigerPaw-8/2/2002
18808Please know that I didn't mean it. I was simply showing that the 'g'E-8/2/2002
18807I have lavender oil, which is pleasant but does zilch, but I'll certain get E-8/2/2002
18806<<If conservatives had any decency, honesty or shame, they wouldn't beIsh-8/2/2002
18805Come now, every village needs an idiot. What would we do without ours?Dayuhan-8/2/2002
18804There are over 2000 princes, I understand, and the ones who recently died are suDayuhan-8/2/2002
18803(pssst -- you know, I have to admit that if I were a RWer, I'd be secretly gE-8/2/2002
18802If conservatives had any decency, honesty or shame, they wouldn't be conservE-8/2/2002
18801I was about to ask if you thought those princes were al Qaeda, but see Laz gave E-8/2/2002
18800<i>Aww, you think I'm making this up, don't you?</i> YesssssLazarus_Long-8/2/2002
18799Now THAT'S what I call serving them up a big fat target! :-)Lazarus_Long-8/2/2002
18798Good lookin' momma makes a good lookin child now...I'd say she mustone_less-8/2/2002
18797Try "shakes" Edit: A shake is 10 nanoseconds. Second edit: You couldWillP-8/2/2002
18796Is the "cluck" vernacular making a come back?one_less-8/2/2002
18795If liberals thought, they wouldn't be liberals. -g-Bill-8/2/2002
18794<i>What kind of chickenpoop outfit is this anyway? I think you must be pw.Lane3-8/2/2002
18793On the basis of this conjectural BS, you allege a conspiracy by the top officersLazarus_Long-8/2/2002
18792Good for you, Laz. Look, I think what TP said about Rumsfeld calling for assasiPoet-8/2/2002
18791That was certainly not a call for assasination of the Saudi Royal family. Wild-Poet-8/2/2002
18790What kind of chickenpoop outfit is this anyway? I think you must be pw. JLAjlallen-8/2/2002
18789Read the header. That's how the thread operates. If you or I exercised jusLazarus_Long-8/2/2002
18788<i>U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld issued a classified memo to Lazarus_Long-8/2/2002
18787Now there's some depressing thoughts. Incense never did it for me. It alwayPoet-8/2/2002
18786I think I still have an assortment of incense in the house, including jasmine. Lane3-8/2/2002
18785<i>This is indeed suspect. I haven't met anyone like this. </i> Lane3-8/2/2002
18784A businessman who admits he doesn't understand politics? And goes further byone_less-8/2/2002
18783<i>I predict they are all going to die. </i> Given a long enough timTigerPaw-8/2/2002
18782<i>"Any idea what's up with the Saudis?"</i> I predicone_less-8/2/2002
18781How long are you going to let this libel spewing idiot foul this thread? Messagjlallen-8/2/2002
18780<i>royal family" numbering in the thousands </i> How many SaudTigerPaw-8/2/2002
18779That is absolutely fascinating about the soporific effects of jasmine. I'vePoet-8/2/2002
18778Thank you, Bill. I'm looking for a unit of measurement, but that <I>dPoet-8/2/2002
18777From today's Post. The Poll Watchers How Independent Are Independents? BLane3-8/2/2002
18776I see. So you take the fact that two members of a "royal family" numbLazarus_Long-8/2/2002
18775The site actually isn't partisan at all. Look what they had to say about GoDayuhan-8/2/2002
18774Some Saudi Princes weren't Carlyle friendly. weeklystandard.com <i>BTigerPaw-8/2/2002
18773Tucson, Arizona Friday, 2 August 2002 Smell your way to better sleep By StevLane3-8/2/2002
18772>>...a word for a very brief period of time<< Instant, trice?Bill Grant-8/2/2002
18771The guy is certifiable....jlallen-8/2/2002
18770If this doesn't do it, exactly what would it take to embarrass a Democrat? Bill-8/2/2002
18769Libel is what I'd call most of it.... I had a modicum of respect for you upjlallen-8/2/2002
18768The leader of the free world, lol... realchange.org All demolib pinhead propagDayuhan-8/1/2002
18767I'm going to be going to Mass and New Hampshire tomorrow. I'll be visitTimF-8/1/2002
18766Looks like a great piece, Tim. Thanks so much. I'll read it in the AM.Poet-8/1/2002
18765Newspaper War Why do our Iraq battle plans keep showing up in the New York TTimF-8/1/2002
18764Thank you so much!Poet-8/1/2002
18763Coincidence? Short life span? They don't love each other any more?Lazarus_Long-8/1/2002
18762femtosecond? microsecond? Planck time? physlink.comLazarus_Long-8/1/2002
18761QUESTION FOR THE THREAD: I'm writing a piece on space travel and need a worPoet-8/1/2002
18760LOL! I'm sure Bush is behind it all....jlallen-8/1/2002
18759Actually, I think I know what it was. I saw it and I figured she'd get suspejlallen-8/1/2002
18758You ain't kiddin'. :-) I never saw it. If you find out, PM me?Poet-8/1/2002
18757Must have been a beaut!!jlallen-8/1/2002
18756She said it was because of a post she'd made to sandintoes (since pulled, I Poet-8/1/2002
18755Wow!! Pourquoi????jlallen-8/1/2002
18754Terminated.Poet-8/1/2002
18753<i>Nice segue. </i> I don't think she agrees. :-)Lazarus_Long-8/1/2002
18752Is she gone for good? Or just suspended??jlallen-8/1/2002
18751So I heard. Nice segue.Lane3-8/1/2002
18750Actually, it was bonnuss_in_austin.Lazarus_Long-8/1/2002
18749>>I agree that the NYT is liberal; the Wall Street Journal, which I subscrBill Grant-8/1/2002
18748You know, you're right about the Mineo-esque qualities he has. And I can sePoet-8/1/2002
18747I saw RJ's father interviewed on CNN. They're from Atlanta. ApparentlyLane3-8/1/2002
18746I have to admit I never saw the earlier Nikki. RJ I find terribly embarrassing.Poet-8/1/2002
18745I've had a soft spot for Nikki all along. Early in the competition she sangLane3-8/1/2002
18744Here's a Bob Herbert editorial in the Tulia arrests from today's NYTimesPoet-8/1/2002
18743Thanks. I can't place her for the life of me, which says something. I hopePoet-8/1/2002
18742Ryan Starr is a woman. I don't remember what she sang. She's not blackLane3-8/1/2002
18741I would not venture to speculate.....Neocon-8/1/2002
18740Oh shoot. Remind me who he is? What did he sing? And how do they announce it?Poet-8/1/2002
18739<i>When are they going to announce who got booted this week?</i> LasLane3-8/1/2002
18738You called? I'm impressed. When are they going to announce who got booted tPoet-8/1/2002
18737You never need any g's with me. <g> My first choice is Kelly. Over Lane3-8/1/2002
18736Kelly's the white woman from Texas, no? I think she'll get it. Her voicPoet-8/1/2002
18735<i>would put a high priority on consistency. </i> But... but... KelE-8/1/2002
18734<i>but are they really that much worse then saturated fats?</i> Tim,Lane3-8/1/2002
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):