SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
Fonar - Where is it going?
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
19354 57 0 FONR
Emcee:  Findit Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
18854Not so brillant if it doesn't translate directly into sales... Even though mJakeStraw-10/17/2003
18853Frank, you completely miss the point - not all coverage is good for you - just David C. Burns-10/16/2003
18852THE BRILLIANCE OF DR. DAMADIAN Not only did Dr. Damadian AND FONAR get FREE MFRANK ROSSI-10/16/2003
18851LOL. . . dream on. . . I will decide that! (eom)Joe Lyddon-10/16/2003
18850JOE, YOU SAID , but I guess we have no 'say' anyway. Sure you hFRANK ROSSI-10/15/2003
18849If I were on the Nobel committee, I'd recommend that Dr. D. stop stamping hiJoe Lyddon-10/15/2003
18848Where's your buddy BlueCheap who predicted FONR would be trading around $3 bJakeStraw-10/14/2003
18847EVEN LAUTERBUR HIMSELF, Gave credit where credit is due . From Diagnostic ImagFRANK ROSSI-10/13/2003
18846CHRIS, I don't like spending 10 bucks for a cup of coffee.FRANK ROSSI-10/13/2003
18845The brilliance of Dr. Damadian and $2.75 will get you a Grande latte at StarbuckThe Philosopher-10/12/2003
18844GARY, As the Stand Up centers GET MORE BUSINESS from this advertising andFRANK ROSSI-10/12/2003
18843DAVID, This media coverage can only HELP Fonar IMO . First CNBC a GE statFRANK ROSSI-10/12/2003
18842Frank This equipment is not like a car that is marketed to the masses. MRI equGary-10/12/2003
18841Frank, Not ALL publicity one might get is positive. We've heard before thaDavid C. Burns-10/11/2003
18840GARY, Just having Dr.D. on CNBC a GE station and Stating RIGHT IN THE BEGIFRANK ROSSI-10/11/2003
18839I own this stock (trade some with a core holding) for over five years. I read, Gary-10/11/2003
18838THE BRILLIANCE OF DR. DAMADIAN The battle is underway . Dr. Damadian vs the NFRANK ROSSI-10/11/2003
18837LOL!! Noticed Fonar in the news, decided to pop over to this thread to see whatThe Philosopher-10/10/2003
18836Sales to related parties is a VERY important point that you brought up. FONR seeJakeStraw-10/10/2003
18835In my opinion, never. Very poorly run company and has floundered around this prEdward Boghosian-10/9/2003
18834The response from Dr. Nath reads like an absolute fraud. When a physician is asEdward Boghosian-10/9/2003
18833When will Fonar be run like a business and enrich shareholders not family memberJakeStraw-10/9/2003
18832Exactly. . . And do they really think they're changing any of their thinkingJoe Lyddon-10/9/2003
18831Fonar should be in business to sell equipment not lobby the Nobel Prize CommitteJakeStraw-10/9/2003
18830Right on! Who cares.. . just pour it down that hole over there! Insert head. .Joe Lyddon-10/9/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):