SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Imclone systems (IMCL)
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2515 89 0 IMCL
Emcee:  Deeber Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1890Character matters?aknahow-1/24/2002
1889"" ''I threw him out,'' said Dr. Leonard A. HerzenbergCacaito-1/24/2002
1888The concern about the patent is that if properly controlled single agent and comkeokalani'nui-1/24/2002
1887BMY speaks...but says nothing about the issue..http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/020124/n2Arthur Radley-1/24/2002
1886George, This could be just one of those "urban legends", but I'm sArthur Radley-1/24/2002
1885Have seen this claim and don't know the reason why it has been mentioned. Whaknahow-1/24/2002
1884For ImClone Drug Entrepreneur, A Past of Celebrity and Notoriety January 24, 20613-1/24/2002
1883I don't think we'll see single digits but low teens sounds probable. Ne613-1/24/2002
1882Merck KGaA's European Development Plan for C225 Remains Unchanged DARMSTADTnigel bates-1/24/2002
1881As for your question about management selling on the open market, in all candor Arthur Radley-1/24/2002
1880Miljenko, Does being arrogant come naturally for you, or do you work at it?Arthur Radley-1/24/2002
1879For ImClone Drug Entrepreneur, a Past of Celebrity and Notoriety By ANDREW POLLsim1-1/24/2002
1878<<"What is the chances that if IMCL goes back and does the required pMiljenko Zuanic-1/24/2002
1877You are correct...BMY isn't the first drug company to buy a "pig in a pArthur Radley-1/23/2002
1876think rally today,and maybe a day or so more,is simply a ton of shorts taking prLTK007-1/23/2002
1875Thanks for a solidly argued case.I bow to your view as the what i believe to be LTK007-1/23/2002
1874The FDA was reviewing an open label Erbitux pII data (no placebo, no concurrent Cacaito-1/23/2002
1873<Is Bristol-Myers-Squibb really this gullible?> If BMY is wrong you shouIRWIN JAMES FRANKEL-1/23/2002
1872Stock price is no longer about Erbitux efficacy. Researchers' reputations s613-1/23/2002
1871<Is Bristol-Myers-Squibb really this gullible?> that's a good point.IfLTK007-1/23/2002
1870"C225 simply isn't what they claim." Is Bristol-Myers-Squibb realM. Charles Swope-1/23/2002
1869thestreet.com I'm afraid what he writes about IMCL being bad for biotechs iArthur Radley-1/23/2002
1868<<It is plain irresponsible and insulting at this time that someone post tMiljenko Zuanic-1/23/2002
1867"ONLY ONE HAVE TO SEARCH FOR IT" The Cancer Letter did follow your adCacaito-1/22/2002
1866Prohost article is poor and plain soap opera dramatics! Their whole argument isCacaito-1/22/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News