SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
DCI Telecommunications - DCTC Today
An SI Board Since August 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
19331 48 0 DCTC
Emcee:  Bruce Galpeer Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
18906Why are we supposed to call a company that has serious charges levied against thernie de la fuente-9/6/2000
18905I still don't know what meeting YOU attended, but in the words of Warner WolERM-9/6/2000
18904Ed, you obviously were not an impartial observer if you did not see the arrogancColin Cody-9/6/2000
18903Mr. Cody, Somebody in an earlier post said that they thought you were at a diffEd Pettee-9/5/2000
18902Ken, I think I do recall him saying that (about the way the votes were cast) tooColin Cody-9/5/2000
18901<i>much of what Joe had to say bordered on the unintelligible</i> KColin Cody-9/5/2000
18900you mean the SEC ..... might not be an unbiased agency? I'm shocked!......don denson-9/5/2000
18899"I am amazed that the possibility exists that the entire SEC complaint is aLaszlo-9/5/2000
18898Let me add an aside. According to Kathy's transcript, much of what Joe had Ken Salaets-9/5/2000
18897Colin, Kathy recorded the proceedings, and then published the transcript on her Ken Salaets-9/5/2000
18896Ken, to reiterate: Joe did not say there were zero write in "no" votesColin Cody-9/5/2000
18895ERM, IMO yes, asking questions about the DCI investment in ROTI are completely aColin Cody-9/5/2000
18894There seems to be a lot of wasted effort talking about voting. The vote was pre-rrufff-9/5/2000
18893I voted via my proxy, Colin, and I sure as hell did <b>not</b> vote Ken Salaets-9/5/2000
18892What?! The whole meeting was (correctly) about management's attempt to recouERM-9/5/2000
18891I voted no at the meeting, and submitted my ballot when asked by the chair. Why ERM-9/5/2000
18890Huh???? I could swear that Kathy's recollection of Adam's response was ernie de la fuente-9/4/2000
18889Colin, Here is ROTI's Letter to Shareholders from August 16th. TANNER’S RESBill Kinkade-9/4/2000
18888ernie, I saw Adams lack of any forthcoming information about the internal workinColin Cody-9/4/2000
18887Ernie,, The Tanners meeting is at the Holiday Inn ,1070 Main St. Bridgeport,CoEd Pettee-9/4/2000
18886ernie, As to yours and Steve's "no" votes, a call to the Company mColin Cody-9/4/2000
18885I can't for the life of me find where I wrote it down as I wasn't inviteernie de la fuente-9/4/2000
18884So true and it seems to me it is time to move past the vote tally as it will havernie de la fuente-9/4/2000
18883Well, I would cheerfully offer to let you vote no if I was going to just careleernie de la fuente-9/4/2000
18882Colin, I give you that you were CLEAR and UNWAVERING in your stance on the SEC.ernie de la fuente-9/4/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News