SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Lucent Technologies (LU)
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
21876 377 0 LU
Emcee:  MRE Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
19001DJ Holder Registers 789,821 of LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC (LU) Dow Jones News Servmatt dillabough-2/21/2002
19000Hope so. I bought a s***load at 5.24 and 5.26 yesterday, too juicy to pass up. IJohn Soileau-2/20/2002
18999Yeah, Danny DeVito and nine others. JohnJohn Soileau-2/20/2002
18998<b>TRIPPLE-BOTTOM.Softechie-2/20/2002
18997<B>Lucent reaffirms sales growth target, profits</B> WILMINGTON, DelDavid Hansen-2/20/2002
18996<b>=DJ Lucent Joins Ranks Choosing To Split Audit, Consulting</b> dsylvester80-2/20/2002
18995<b>=DJ Lucent Will Expand By Taking Market Share, CEO Says >LU</b>sylvester80-2/20/2002
18994<<"We think a good number (of board members) is somewhere between ninSawtooth-2/20/2002
18993<b>=DJ Lucent Board-2:Co Reiterates 2Q Rev To Rise 10-15% Vs 1Q</b> sylvester80-2/20/2002
18992Bought in today at $5.35.Softechie-2/20/2002
18991<i>Lazard raised the stock (LU) to a buy from a hold.</i> cbs.markeSouze-2/20/2002
18990<b>Lucent Technologies to Provide High-Speed Optical Network for Korean Nasylvester80-2/20/2002
18989Anon, Thanks for the comments. I guess it seems that SI needs the user to use thsylvester80-2/20/2002
18988Ericsson, Nortel in Running for Telefonica Order (Correct) By Thomas Mulier (CoKenneth E. Phillipps-2/20/2002
18987I wrote my first message then decided to ad another statement. I didn't useAnonymous-2/20/2002
18986So what did you do to post the message 3 times? I've seen that before and sisylvester80-2/19/2002
18985Back nearly two years ago on <b>March 23, 2000</b>, I created a portAnonymous-2/19/2002
18984Back nearly two years ago on <b>March 23, 2000</b>, I created a portAnonymous-2/19/2002
18983Back nearly two years ago on <b>March 23, 2000</b>, I created a portAnonymous-2/19/2002
18982Dolfan: I also like the way Lu continues to align itself tightly with CDMA. ThSawtooth-2/19/2002
18981I also agree. Just the Bloodbath today was not all LU. But the uncertainty is stDolfan-2/19/2002
18980<<This is not an entirely LU issue!>> Agreed, Dolfan. Still, I thiSawtooth-2/19/2002
18979Just a suggestion! Take a look today everything got slammed. All is in the red. Dolfan-2/19/2002
18978Dib: I agree with all of the points in your post. With regard to Lucent, speciSawtooth-2/19/2002
18977>IMHO, LU at $5.22 is either the bargain of the decade or ... Calls are realDiB-2/19/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News