The Supreme Court, All Right or All Wrong? | Political Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics
The Supreme Court, All Right or All Wrong?

An SI Board Since July 2005

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
3029	28	0

Emcee: sandintoes	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1904	Yes the NRA is pretty savvy, but they can still be negatively impacted by such	TimF	-	1/16/2007
1903	It is the fact that the truth is so often unfortunate that keeps CYBERKEN off a	CYBERKEN	-	1/16/2007
1902	<I>This doesn't seem to be an issue of getting the message out, or bei	sandintoes	-	1/16/2007
1901	Agreed...the Constitution wins every decision. Period, amen, end of argument.	sandintoes	-	1/16/2007
1900	Actually, the NRA is one of the savviest pressure groups in history. They do qu	ManyMoose	-	1/15/2007
1899	That is my take as well. Not good. <I> to effectively "drown out&qu	ManyMoose	-	1/15/2007
1898	"I wonder how congress and the courts would react to a paper or radio or TV	Jim S	-	1/15/2007
1897	The really rich could run themselves, even if they don't expect to win, bu	TimF	-	1/15/2007
1896	I suspect a significant part of the law, as well as the SCOTUS ruling, was to ef	Jim S	-	1/15/2007
1895	<I> Acknowledging that critics had a point in saying the law violates free	TimF	-	1/15/2007
1894	I agree. I don't completely discount stare decisis, but I think it should	TimF	-	1/15/2007
1893	Unfortunately that's true.	sandintoes	-	1/14/2007
1892	Nothing can be done, that's why it is so important we get the right person i	sandintoes	-	1/14/2007
1891	<<How could this man be a SC judge??? It is outrageous...>> Unlimit	CYBERKEN	-	1/14/2007
1890	I think so too.	ManyMoose	-	1/14/2007
1889	How could this man be a SC judge??? It is outrageous...	sandintoes	-	1/13/2007
1888	Ya got me! I have no idea.	ManyMoose	-	1/13/2007
1887	Whatever happened to the saying, "in a democracy, majority rules" ? jd	JDN	-	1/13/2007
1886	<I>Justice Stephen G. Breyer says the Supreme Court must promote the polit	ManyMoose	-	1/13/2007
1885	My feelings are that just because one court ruled one way, it doesn't mean i	sandintoes	-	1/12/2007
1884	Here we are with our courts in a log jam, and they don't have any more cases	sandintoes	-	1/12/2007
1883	<B>Breyer Talks of Practical Applications of Constitution Sunday , Decemb	sandintoes	-	1/12/2007
1882	Rules trump personalities WALTER WILLIAMS By Walter E. Williams washtimes.com	TimF	-	1/12/2007
1881	It figures. They wouldn't be rated by the DOJ, because that's the execu	ManyMoose	-	1/12/2007
1880	More consensus and unanimity might be good, but perhaps Roberts makes too much	TimF	-	1/12/2007

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):