SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
5spl
An SI Board Since April 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2534 28 0
Emcee:  LPS5 Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1909I don't know enough to have strong opinions on them. It appears that they arSiouxPal-6/23/2005
1908 What do you have against Thomas? TimTimF-6/23/2005
1907SiouxPal, what do you think of the RICO statutes? - HollyLady Lurksalot-6/23/2005
1906Wow we agree on something. Awesome.SiouxPal-6/23/2005
1905SiouxPal, I never held any of them in particularly high esteem, particularly JusLady Lurksalot-6/23/2005
1904Laz, They are all astute in the letter of the law--which makes it really hard foLady Lurksalot-6/23/2005
1903SiouxPal, I never held any of them in particularly high esteem, particularly JusLady Lurksalot-6/23/2005
1902Impeaching 5 justices can take forever too unless they're tried together.Lazarus_Long-6/23/2005
1901How do you feel about <u>your</u> Supreme Court justices?Lazarus_Long-6/23/2005
1900So now how do you feel about your Supreme Court justices?SiouxPal-6/23/2005
1899I emailed my congressman and senator and said: If I wanted a communist, I wouldDominick-6/23/2005
1898Laz, a Constitutional amendment can take lifetimes and usually is not a good wayLady Lurksalot-6/23/2005
1897I think the Congresscritters will be hearing about this. They have choice of reLazarus_Long-6/23/2005
1896Laz, I think you'll have to get in line. <g> I still am having troublLady Lurksalot-6/23/2005
1895Impeachment, Heqq! I'll buy the rope! :-) Here's the 4 who get to staLazarus_Long-6/23/2005
1894MD, I can only hope it is overturned by them and recognized for the folly (an unLady Lurksalot-6/23/2005
1893<i>Not since the Boston Tea Party</i> i've seen this decision pMulhollandDrive-6/23/2005
1892MD, It is indeed outrageous! I am numb! Civil disobedience? Fat lot of good tLady Lurksalot-6/23/2005
1891i'm outraged thinking civil disobedience here maybe a citizen barricade arMulhollandDrive-6/23/2005
1890MD, I'd impeach the bunch of them! I am speechless and breathless consideriLady Lurksalot-6/23/2005
1889who would you impeach? all five justices who wrote the majority decision kenneMulhollandDrive-6/23/2005
1888My sympathy goes out to the Alabama family who's daughter is missing in ArubHairBall-6/23/2005
1887MD, Impeachment comes to mind, for such is an option for USSC judges under the Lady Lurksalot-6/23/2005
1886i am absolutely shocked i suppose the only way to 'overturn' it is by sMulhollandDrive-6/23/2005
1885<i>e</i>: My jaw has hit the floor with the "eminent domain&quoHairBall-6/23/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):