SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Cell Pathways (CLPA)
An SI Board Since October 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
566 24 0 CLPA
Emcee:  KFBLY Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
191 Dirk - agreed. I have been scratching my head trying to figure out what couldNeuroguy-2/24/1999
190 Dirk... I agree with you. They don't move from level 2 testing to level thrNorm Magic-2/23/1999
189 I still think it's dollar cost averaging time. Probably the best buying opDirk-2/22/1999
188 Good point, Bob. Mike has been all over the Yahoo and Raging Bull CLPA boards Neuroguy-2/20/1999
187 Anyone who was short this stock going into the announcement is probably too busMichael Young-2/14/1999
186 Isn't it a little early to file a lawsuit? Wouldn't someone of good faiCPAMarty-2/14/1999
185 <<I think you will find that Prevatac is a very promising treatment forMichael Young-2/14/1999
184 I think you will find that what was flawed was the protocol, not the drug. I bob-2/14/1999
183 <<Sorry Mike, the bottom line here is THE DRUG WORKS. Got that? >>Michael Young-2/14/1999
182 We all know you are short Mike. Enough already. The announcement by these slebob-2/13/1999
181 Maybe you should debunk some of the bullish hype also. I can't believe somMichael Young-2/13/1999
180 Lets start a Mike Young watch-biot to alert us when he pops up anywhere. WeKFBLY-2/13/1999
179 mikey mikey mikey found your way to SI sdr-2/13/1999
178 I'm not saying that you came to the wrong conclusion. I think that it *is*scaram(o)uche-2/13/1999
177 If you are the self processed expert on biotechs then give me some stock tipsHerc-2/13/1999
176 I have just read a heap of books on technical analysis and am saying that you aHerc-2/12/1999
175 That makes two posts in a row where you're implying some sort of special inscaram(o)uche-2/12/1999
174 Fundamentals, smundementals, especially with something as ephemeral as startuHerc-2/12/1999
173 Agree with you completely. Unfortunately, some would rather egange in personalMichael Young-2/12/1999
172 The issues with biotechs are (1) science and how it integrates with a business scaram(o)uche-2/12/1999
171 <<Mike-You've also been roundly booed on the bull for being out of tMichael Young-2/12/1999
170 From my brief foray into small biotechs I have learned they are real crapshooHerc-2/12/1999
169 Mike-You've also been roundly booed on the bull for being out of touch witKFBLY-2/12/1999
168 I've posted quite a bit on that thread. CLPA may have a little more upsidMichael Young-2/12/1999
167 There's an interesting discussion of CLPA on the Ragingbull message board. DLJMT-2/12/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News