SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Discussion Thread
An SI Board Since May 2008
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3816 14 0
Emcee:  one_less Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1916 Its more the other way around. The social nets only survive do to the wealth TimF-9/16/2008
1915Then all we have are specific examples to respond to...which is what we do. andc.hinton-9/16/2008
1914That I'm pointing out the obvious? <i>What can i say?DMaA-9/16/2008
1913 The whole issue is a vague general statement, not subject to proof by specificTimF-9/16/2008
1912What can i say?c.hinton-9/16/2008
1911but tim, you have not put forth any argument or information...only vague generalc.hinton-9/16/2008
1910No let's double them. And let's let non-citizens vote so we can show theDMaA-9/16/2008
1909 If the market had gone up 25% in 6 months it would be nice but hardly remarkabTimF-9/16/2008
1908If you had four M&Ms and your number of M&Ms increased 25% would you notDMaA-9/16/2008
1907gosh if your net worth had gone up 25% in six months would you not consider thatc.hinton-9/16/2008
1906yes i have already pointed out my mistake......and again you point out the obvic.hinton-9/16/2008
1905That isn't "gone up to a very great extent". That's "gTimF-9/16/2008
1904 I suppose almost every regulation is at least claimed to be in response to somTimF19/16/2008
1903Tim, since jan its gone from 4.9 to 6.1...thats up 25% in 6 months.c.hinton-9/16/2008
1902Tim......show me a major financial regulation that was not in response to some cc.hinton-9/16/2008
1901 Perhaps we have different definitions about "very great extent", butTimF-9/16/2008
1900Tim show me a post where you show some understanding ......Mine are there from lc.hinton-9/16/2008
1899 Some of it is a response to abuse. Much of it is not. And then some of theTimF-9/16/2008
1898DMaa,you point out the obvious....we are always fighting yesterdays battle. surc.hinton-9/16/2008
1897 In your opinion, but not in reality.TimF19/16/2008
1896sorry tim,you have consistantly under estimated the severity of the problem.c.hinton-9/16/2008
1895You missed the important point. We are AWASH in regulation designed not to allowDMaA29/16/2008
1894 I'm not confusing anything, I addressed both monetary issues, and bailoutsTimF-9/16/2008
1893Tim i am just pointing out to expect alot more regulation...and taxes. and tim,c.hinton-9/16/2008
1892I don't think inflation is going to be a consistent 5 and a half percent forTimF-9/16/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News