Safeguard Scientifics SFE | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Safeguard Scientifics SFE

An SI Board Since May 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
4467	83	0	SFE

Emcee: Mark Sagarin	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1917	TA experts, It appears to me that their is significant resistance in the $25-$	robert miller	-	10/30/1998
1916	Nice profit, Mike. NAV today moves up again slightly, as it rounds $20 to clos	John Arnopp	-	10/30/1998
1915	John, just sold the recent CMPC purchase. Still have probably to much from pre	michael r potter	-	10/30/1998
1914	Mike, I don't have a good answer, but I don't think it's the Inter	John Arnopp	-	10/30/1998
1913	John, All kidding aside, a 30% premium will not be maintained indefinitely. O	michael r potter	-	10/30/1998
1912	Mike, I would be comfortable with zero premium, given no offerings and the h	John Arnopp	-	10/30/1998
1911	John, Why do you think the premium will narrow from a current 30% to a measly	michael r potter	-	10/30/1998
1910	No, actually all the companies are going to announce a new Internet strategy to	John Arnopp	-	10/29/1998
1909	Does that mean NAV will open at $1 and the stock will trade at $21? That would	still learning	-	10/29/1998
1908	It's tomorrow's premium. You just can't keep a good stock down!	John Arnopp	-	10/29/1998
1907	Is that what you want for your shares, or what you think ICG is worth? ;} (no n	still learning	-	10/29/1998
1906	<pre><b><i>$19.97</i></b></pre>	John Arnopp	-	10/29/1998
1905	I do agree, obviously, and I hope it's not the "I-word" giving th	John Arnopp	-	10/29/1998
1904	Valuing the "future NAV" of private co's is a lot like valuing th	still learning	-	10/29/1998
1903	Michael, I have to say that I am NOT comfortable with that explanation, even i	John Arnopp	-	10/29/1998
1902	Michael, I think you are right. I think ICG has been in operation for about t	robert miller	-	10/29/1998
1901	Something is different this time. Unlike the previous ('97] bottom, when S	michael r potter	-	10/29/1998
1900	* OFF TOPIC - sort of * Just reading Burton Malkiel's "A Random Walk	John Arnopp	-	10/27/1998
1899	CMPC won't bring the premium CCSC did. CATP maybe, but who's buying&quo	still learning	-	10/27/1998
1898	A 33% premium...... Another big merger deal like CCSC? CMPC? How big could tha	David Lawrence	-	10/27/1998
1897	For the shorts out there, bob and Robert (wisely) not among them, the NAV at th	John Arnopp	-	10/27/1998
1896	Robert, I believe the general climate has changed with world wide interest rate	llwk7051@aol.com	-	10/27/1998
1895	David, The small stocks look stronger than the big caps recently. Could this	robert miller	-	10/27/1998
1894	Yeah, how about that! But, it's the standing on 12/31 that counts.	David Lawrence	-	10/26/1998
1893	Yes, and your QWST did well today, too. Not to mention your top standing in th	John Arnopp	-	10/26/1998

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):