SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
Saliva Diagnostics (SALV)
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3369 5 0 SALVD
Emcee:  Jeffrey Ogbar Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1919 Jim, I have seen turnaround interest that was pretty quick but you just broke John Lacelle-1/17/1998
1918 Good morning Tom, I was just thinking (dangerous for me) once SALV reverses andHarold-1/17/1998
1917 The announcement is to authorize a split of no more than 1 for 10. At current lJoe Williamson-1/16/1998
1916 Thank you, This is my first (and hopefully last) experience a reverse spitShadow-1/16/1998
1915 Reverse Split Math If SALV does a 10 for 1 reverse split the number of authoriHockeyfan-1/16/1998
1914 Their last quartely report was filed with the SEC on Nov 14, 1997 It stands to Shadow-1/16/1998
1913 Tom and All: I decided that maybe by reading the following again I would be ablHarold-1/16/1998
1912 I think a 1 for 10 spilt would solve the NASDAQ listing requirements but withouShadow-1/15/1998
1911 The split will have to be 1 for 15 or maybe 1 for 20 to stay listed gangLastShadow-1/15/1998
1910 Thanks Tom! They must foresee positive earnings. Negative earnings coupled wiGreene-1/15/1998
1909 The minimum requirements for NASDAQ listing are 1 million in shareholder's Shadow-1/15/1998
1908 I suppose you're right. What is the floor again for being delisted? Is it Greene-1/15/1998
1907 That will be the telling tale. If some positive financials are released the baGreene-1/15/1998
1906 Does anyone know any details of the proposed reverse split ? 1 for 2 ? I guessNigel Bird-1/15/1998
1905 I believe the reverse split is necessary for the to keep from being delisted. WJoe Williamson-1/15/1998
1904 ChLady, I know that the stock must be reversed. My idea is to not reverse the brad greene-1/15/1998
1903 I too have a boat load of warrants. My understanding is that warrants reverse sChLady-1/15/1998
1902 If I remember correctly, last fall when the new production equipment was instalBruce Rozenblit-1/15/1998
1901 I agree. If the company isn't doing well now(and things don't change)iGreene-1/15/1998
1900 I am out at market in the AM I don't care what I saw during that visit IJim Berg-1/14/1998
1899 I guess I'm not clear on these opinions - I've never seen a reverse splLastShadow-1/14/1998
1898 cmg, As a warrant holder...I must say how important it is that the warrants nobrad greene-1/14/1998
1897 all.....thought you folks might want to know......per sec filing ......yesterdacmg-1/14/1998
1896 Found the following on Yahoo: messages.yahoo.com@m2.yahoo.comHarold-1/9/1998
1895 You may be right Keiko. It is awful. Last year or so I heard that the FDA approHarold-1/6/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News