SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
LASERPACIFIC (lpac)
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
542 11 0 LPAC
Emcee:  Bobby Yellin Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
192 Thank you JSB, that sounds reasonable to me. Scrapps-3/24/1999
191 Long term is somewhere between 18 and 36 months. I think in that time frame wJSB-3/24/1999
190 Tell me JSB, what is long term to you with regard to LPAC? Scrapps-3/24/1999
189 Short term, there is no telling where we might go. Long term, I'm quiteJSB-3/24/1999
188 LPAC 2.78125 ...not going to get them an Oscar with this performance. <Scrapps-3/24/1999
187 scrappy.... mah word, such emotion. the fact is, as has been noted here: perhaflickerful-3/24/1999
186 Oh yes! I forgot about "they"...they could be keeping the stock pricScrapps-3/24/1999
185 Interest in LPAC did die down after last years '97 earnings announcement - J L Segal-3/24/1999
184 Flickerful, Many thanks, at least Chase Manhattan sees what we do. Bill Bill Coenen-3/24/1999
183 scrapps.... well, not really. there are simply less buyers at higher prices. hflickerful-3/24/1999
182 from vickers, although there may be more recent activity: Top Five Institutionflickerful-3/24/1999
181 >>>dropping of the bid looks awfully convenient<<< Oh...I tScrapps-3/24/1999
180 Scrapps, I know its tough for stocks under $5 to get the big boys interested buBill Coenen-3/24/1999
179 it looks to me as if someone is accumulating....at bargain basement prices. thflickerful-3/24/1999
178 Bill, LPAC suffers from Rodney Dangerfield syndrome and a poor PR dept. I guessScrapps-3/24/1999
177 All, Great quarter of a breakout year, visionary leadership in a strong sector,Bill Coenen-3/24/1999
176 Huh? <g> Scrapps-3/24/1999
175 from the HDTV article....emory cohen: <i>Cohen: The computer is why we nflickerful-3/24/1999
174 <b>HDTV and the Future of Entertainment</b>/ film & video/feb99flickerful-3/24/1999
173 Not to start anything Flickerful...but when this LPAC gets running do you thinkScrapps-3/22/1999
172 I'm trying to remember the events of last year at this time...Did it not taBob Banas-3/22/1999
171 They are not at capacity. IR said they had basically a 25 by 7 operation due tDavid O'Berry-3/22/1999
170 Shaggerific, baaaaby! Alegzis-3/22/1999
169 LPAC/New Line Cinema/"Pleasantville" DVD story links: ohms.com DiscJim Mac-3/21/1999
168 LPAC's performance last Friday after the spectacular earnings announcement J L Segal-3/21/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News