SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Business Wire Falls for April Fools Prank, Sues FBNers
An SI Board Since April 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3795 39 0
Emcee:  EL KABONG!!! Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1920 ...might as well take the next one... Janice Shell-5/5/1999
1919 Double double! Though there's a blank post, so... Janice Shell-5/5/1999
1918 You stated it as fact. And you should be more careful. Also, read this. CompreEllen-5/5/1999
1917 > <i>'They' don't ("Šget special treatment"). &lEllen-5/5/1999
1916 #reply-9275677 Don Pueblo-5/5/1999
1915 <i> an academic question: was any "investor" injuredJanice Shell-5/5/1999
1914 Solon article is out. Diamond Dave, uh huh. salon.com salon.com Don Pueblo-5/5/1999
1913 <i> 2001 isn't that far off into the future</i> you're taljbIII-5/5/1999
1912 Fortunately, those who had considered the releases to be news now understand thtonto-5/5/1999
1911 >>>>>I like that part where Tamaraz says that the incident pointzonkie-5/5/1999
1910 Zonkie, Bloomberg Article: <i>At Business Wire, spokeswoman Cathy Baron John Sladek-5/5/1999
1909 >>>>Are you sure that's what you meant to say - as a fact ?<zonkie-5/5/1999
1908 These posters simply have personal vendettas from other threads and I doubt thetonto-5/5/1999
1907 Even <b>much</b> worse than that—now joining the ranks of badly Bill Ulrich-5/5/1999
1906 MrB, It gets worse... 2001 isn't that far off into the future... KJC EL KABONG!!!-5/5/1999
1905 …and <i>this</i> seemed so far in the future: “I am a HAL 9000 comBill Ulrich-5/5/1999
1904 Marcos, check your inbox for a private message.<eom> swot-5/5/1999
1903swot-5/5/1999
1902 <i>...will i dream, dave?</i> (I can still hear Mr. Rain's voiLevel Head-5/5/1999
1901 <i>Read this article from the Law News Network...</i> thanks for tMENSO-5/5/1999
1900 <i>claiming that a false and misleading press release was simply an aprilJeffrey S. Mitchell-5/5/1999
1899 wait wait wait…none of us ever said BW was a paid stock promoter. I would speciBill Ulrich-5/5/1999
1898 <i>No money ever changed hands hence there were no "investors" MENSO-5/5/1999
1897 'They' don't (“…get special treatment”). 216PU was having trouble sBill Ulrich-5/5/1999
1896 jeff. thanks for the confirmation; i'm off to read the pleadings... laterflickerful-5/5/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):