SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Lucent Technologies (LU)
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
21876 377 0 LU
Emcee:  MRE Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
19301GV, They announced another conv't offering? What's up with that?Dave-3/12/2002
19300Great... another wall of resistance... <ng>DiB-3/12/2002
19299<i>...the street has yet to price in a 30% gap difference between the two Kenneth E. Phillipps-3/12/2002
19298IN THE PIPELINE: Lucent's Lambda Family May Make It Alpha 12 Mar 11:00 Softechie-3/12/2002
19297It's trading around $5.30's now...I'll wait for $5.25 tomorrow.Softechie-3/12/2002
19296Found another analyst who didn't have to lower his numbers, the guy over at GVTucker-3/12/2002
19295LU just announced a $1.5 billion convert offering.GVTucker-3/12/2002
19294How about, a company that sells $14 billion of stuff per year (LU) and loses monElroy-3/12/2002
19293<b>Former Merrill Fund Manager Meeks Comments on Technology Stocks</b&gsylvester80-3/12/2002
19292Next order in for $5,25...Softechie-3/12/2002
192911st order went through $5,50...Softechie-3/12/2002
19290It's hanging good at $5.50...Softechie-3/12/2002
19289Actually the stock is up close to 10% from this morning. I would call this buyinsylvester80-3/12/2002
19288And the price is up almost 10% from this morning. So I guess you are wrong. Thansylvester80-3/12/2002
19287<i>BTW, you yourself stated the quarter was "so bad". My questioGVTucker-3/12/2002
19286The bubble ones yes. And I still do. JNPR at $14 today. <gg>sylvester80-3/12/2002
19285My apologies for the implications. Sabre!Sabrejet-3/12/2002
19284Agree for once on the reading of the filings. But, to imply that current managemSabrejet-3/12/2002
19283i'll let the stock price speak for itself.Brasco One-3/12/2002
19282One analyst had lower numbers--that is not the Street. As I have stated, that&#GVTucker-3/12/2002
19281I can still remember those days for shorting networkers...Softechie-3/12/2002
19280You still did not answer the fact that wall street had priced in much lower guidsylvester80-3/12/2002
19279Sabrejet, RE: <i>Someone who has all the info before anyone else!</i&GVTucker-3/12/2002
19278And Lucent was trading at $80s at the time. Time to wake up that is not in the 8sylvester80-3/12/2002
19277Sabrejet, RE: <i>GVT, you don't know squat about the quarter.</i&GVTucker-3/12/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):