SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Stop the War!
An SI Board Since March 2003
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21614 34 0
Emcee:  PartyTime Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
19339Tough question. jttmabjttmab-7/18/2003
19338whatever, you are a waste of timeAK2004-7/18/2003
19337<i>just as soon as you explain to me the conceptual difference between US jttmab-7/18/2003
19336<i>where is the word "innocent"?</i> Are you having troubjttmab-7/18/2003
19335re: <i>where is the word "innocent"?</i> I suppose that yAK2004-7/18/2003
19334re: <i>significance of jamming US frequencies</i> just as soon as yAK2004-7/18/2003
19333<i>Hamas is more careful than the Israel.</i> That I said.....wherejttmab-7/18/2003
19332<i>are you intentionally trying to sound that stupid? Just curious......&ljttmab-7/18/2003
19331re: <i>But I never said that Hamas was innocent.</i> as a matter of AK2004-7/18/2003
19330re: <i>That's a darn good reason to jam US frequencies</i> are yAK2004-7/18/2003
19329<i>right, and Israel was not bothered by striking force approaching from 2jttmab-7/18/2003
19328Could very well be. But I never said that Hamas was innocent. jttmabjttmab-7/18/2003
19327right, and Israel was not bothered by striking force approaching from 2 US carriAK2004-7/18/2003
19326I did not make that up, even as recent as few weeks back hamas confirmed that thAK2004-7/18/2003
19325<i>because Israel was told by US that there were no US ships in the area ajttmab-7/18/2003
19324<i>it is pretty obvious - innocent hamas and plo who openly target childrejttmab-7/18/2003
19323re: <i>Why are you talking about the Arabs</i> because Israel was tAK2004-7/18/2003
19322it is pretty obvious - innocent hamas and plo who openly target children and allAK2004-7/18/2003
19321<i>Yep. But not as you have.... </i> You lost me on that one. jttmjttmab-7/18/2003
19320Yep. But not as you have....jlallen-7/18/2003
19319<i>"Gossip" is something fishwives throw over the fence at each jttmab-7/18/2003
19318Having not seen the documents nor the means by which they were discredited myseljlallen-7/18/2003
19317<i>....alleged to have been forgeries</i> It's hard to find somjttmab-7/18/2003
19316Graham is on the intelligence committee, presumably knows something about the injlallen-7/18/2003
19315story.news.yahoo.com I have now decided to vote Republican no matter what, afteSojourner Smith-7/18/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News