SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Lucent Technologies (LU)
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
21876 377 0 LU
Emcee:  MRE Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
19401I think you missed what the message was about. It had to do with your statement sylvester80-3/13/2002
19400Why is that any different than having 3.4 billion or more in the bank that earnssylvester80-3/13/2002
19399I think it is you who must read up on arbitrage. See the posts by others re conCharles Tutt-3/13/2002
19398I also picked a few more shares in the 4s today.sylvester80-3/13/2002
19397GV, >the arbs will just deliver shares obtained through the convert against tDiB-3/13/2002
19396Thanks much. That explains my (hopefully) temporary confusion on the conversion LiPolymer-3/13/2002
19395Yes, assuming no BK (reasonable assumption IMO), any shares shorted to hedge theLiPolymer-3/13/2002
19394I'm not sure you've noticed, that the example was about the previous conDiB-3/13/2002
19393down on volume down last few dayshdl-3/13/2002
19392<i>Conversion premium of 22% over the $6.13 closing price</i> So coLiPolymer-3/13/2002
19391Sylvester, I added in the high 4's. We've discussed this situation enouZeddie88-3/13/2002
19390On the contrary, most likely none of those short shares will have to be covered,GVTucker-3/13/2002
19389<i>float a new issue in the face of such weakness</i> Volume 217 misylvester80-3/13/2002
19388It must be unpleasant to have to float a new issue in the face of such weakness.Charles Tutt-3/13/2002
19387Regarding marginability, the $5 number isn't significant at all for institutGVTucker-3/13/2002
19386ACCOUNT-ABILITY: Former High-Fliers Stand To Gain Blns From New Tax Law By JANESoftechie-3/13/2002
19385sylvester80, you're o'k!!I like your attitude and you do good work diggiSabrejet-3/13/2002
19384Man, I think that is jumping way too early on that(institutions), regardless of Sabrejet-3/13/2002
19383There is huge demand for the convertibles. Lucent may get $1.75B to $2B from it.sylvester80-3/13/2002
19382<b>Article on Lucent's action today.</b> biz.yahoo.com Wednesdsylvester80-3/13/2002
19381and all the knights too...I wonder who can stay in the game...not that POS JNPR.Softechie-3/13/2002
19380Based on last covertible it didn't really do anything...Softechie-3/13/2002
19379Aug 2 2001 6:46 AM In Play Lucent Tech (LU) 6.13: Company prices its $1.75 bln cSoftechie-3/13/2002
19378The King is Dead.Runner-3/13/2002
193773:37PM Lucent Tech: CNBC reports that co ups convertible offering to $1.75-$2.0 DiB-3/13/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News