SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
ORXX - Orex Gold Mines Corporation
An SI Board Since May 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2392 11 0 ORXX
Emcee:  GOLDLOADED Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1942 I AGREE! CUBBYCUBBY-10/5/1999
1941 Hi, can you share some of the stocks your speaking of??? <<I've seen J. Nelson-10/5/1999
1940 Anyone notice the interesting trading patterns over the last few days? There isRichard Mazzarella-10/5/1999
1939 Gary, Ok, then what's your conclusion? Shorts? I have been around pennies tRichard Mazzarella-10/5/1999
1938 Ga Bard, thanks for the post, I agree fully. {EOM}Trailblazer-10/4/1999
1937 DANG RIGHT JEFF SHOW ME!!! As usual Jeff you are full of it. For all I know yGa Bard-10/4/1999
1936 <i>Good find. So much for Ga Bard's DD as <b>ORXX themselves<Qone0-10/4/1999
1935 So what you're saying is that the person on RB I quoted is flat out lying, Jeffrey S. Mitchell-10/4/1999
1934 Wrong again Jeff!! The post on RB is a theory with no factual basis. Orex has nSTOCKWOLF-10/4/1999
1933 Good find. So much for Ga Bard's DD as ORXX themselves have now confirmed iJeffrey S. Mitchell-10/4/1999
1932 J Nelson I don't know how true this info is but it makes more sense then sundecided-10/4/1999
1931 I do not have a clue. I have not been watching the trading. Just be glad whenGa Bard-10/4/1999
1930 Gary: Any idea were all the stock is from that's beeing sold? It would seJ. Nelson-10/4/1999
1929 tide Actually moron I just noticed my inbox for the first time and responded aundecided-10/3/1999
1928 <i> As far as paying to join SI it was a waste but I have done worsTideGlider-10/2/1999
1927 Tide I'll admit that gbard does more than his fair share of posts. So many undecided-10/2/1999
1926 Yes, you are right; I should have defined "we". I meant those of us wJeffrey S. Mitchell-9/29/1999
1925 Prison Futures .... LMAO ... Now that is a good one. Been to busy to watch theGa Bard-9/29/1999
1924 Yes, Nattering nabobs of negativism. Spiro Agnew EightyEight-9/29/1999
1923 LOL!! You are a riot! Dick Nixon bob-9/29/1999
1922 Jeff: I suppose you didn't really write post #1916 either. You have a badSportfish-9/29/1999
1921 I just posted that reply of yours at RB Chucka Chuca Marsh-9/29/1999
1920 At this point I don't know whether FifthAvenue is lying or whether someone Jeffrey S. Mitchell-9/29/1999
1919 You do it. He's lieing about you not me. Make me believe. I was just brQone0-9/29/1999
1918 How humorous. That was an outright lie! Tell you what, since I know you and Ga Jeffrey S. Mitchell-9/29/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News