SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Safeguard Scientifics SFE
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4467 83 0 SFE
Emcee:  Mark Sagarin Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1942 John, CMG Information Services $60 to $75 in two days! Internet, the mmichael r potter-11/5/1998
1941 $6.25 (or only 32%) at Noon, Wall Street time.John Arnopp-11/5/1998
1940 Michael, CMPC reorganization continues. bloomberg.com Also, CC today. newsrobert miller-11/5/1998
1939 The WSJ reported Tue. that CATP repriced options in Oct. for all employees excemichael r potter-11/3/1998
1938 Yes, but this has all been on the wings of a major mkt updraft. Today SFE actustill learning-11/3/1998
1937 OK. $19.70, so 37% premium. Unbelievable. John Arnopp-11/3/1998
1936 Internet! Never touch the stuff, so I hope I'm not just biased. But last John Arnopp-11/3/1998
1935 Robert, Your welcome. Might as well go out on a limb until it cracks. michael r potter-11/3/1998
1934 John, I still believe SFE is trading above it's NAV, and will continue to robert miller-11/2/1998
1933 Hey, I like my "dividend method" as long as SFE is paying dividends.John Arnopp-11/2/1998
1932 Robert, I don't think we should worry abiout the cash cause it's probvastill learning-11/2/1998
1931 To all, Are we missing key information in our net asset valuation calculations?llwk7051@aol.com-11/2/1998
1930 OK, so NAV is now $20 using 35 mm shrs and 21.8 using 32 mm shares (I think we still learning-11/2/1998
1929 Michael, Thank you for the information. I really appreciate it. bobrobert miller-11/2/1998
1928 Mike, Although not a technician, I appreciate your analysis. I think the markJohn Arnopp-11/2/1998
1927 John, Interesting. Projected high was $28-$28 1/2. Actual high was $28 1/4. michael r potter-11/2/1998
1926 Mike, I hope you are right, technically, and that Safeguard can come back in lJohn Arnopp-11/2/1998
1925 Decided to act on it. Just sold some SFE bought last week. Will re-enter latermichael r potter-11/2/1998
1924 Using a 38% retracement of the entire move down, gives a target of $28 -$28 1/michael r potter-11/2/1998
1923 Ouch... getting a little <i>squeeeeezed</i> today. But, I'm suDavid Lawrence-11/2/1998
1922 Yes, there is quite a lot of resistance between $25 and $28. Of more concern fmichael r potter-11/1/1998
1921 To me the flaw in the efficient market hypothesis is the assumption that ratioJune-11/1/1998
1920 Thanks, June. I'll look for the Dreman book. I actually am not convinced John Arnopp-11/1/1998
1919 I bought SFE as way to have a play in venture capital. I do not have the time, June-11/1/1998
1918 bob, and Mike, Charts & TA don't do it for me. I have considered myseJohn Arnopp-10/31/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):