SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Oxford Health Plan (OXHP)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2068 12 0 OXHP
Emcee:  Lee A. Rosin Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1943 The way this is acting we might see 25 by next Friday. I have notice a lot of pTerror-1/9/1999
1942 We backfilled from the 14-15 level after a good run...it's just plain breakHarlock-1/9/1999
1941 Clark- This is pure speculation- but my guess would be that we will see a buyouTony van Werkhooven-1/8/1999
1940 Tony... a quick question. Where do you think OXHP stands a chance of being a yeWorswick-1/8/1999
1939 Clark- I never doubted it could come back- the only issue was how deep the chasTony van Werkhooven-1/8/1999
1938 Premier too Tony was holding a huge OXHP position: a terrifically knowledgeableWorswick-1/8/1999
1937 Clark- good to see you are still there. Unfortunately we got in too early. HoweTony van Werkhooven-1/8/1999
1936 Raptor where are you? They did it. Almost 2,000 posts on this thread and thWorswick-1/8/1999
1935 Thanks.PatiBob-1/8/1999
1934 News out today !! very positive !! All over CNBC !! vestor-1/8/1999
1933 CIGNA just sold part of their business to a Bermuda Insurance Company a couple Terror-1/7/1999
1932 CI is CIGNA Tony van Werkhooven-1/7/1999
1931 Who or what is CI? PB PatiBob-1/7/1999
1930 OXHP, WLP & AET are rumored targets of CI once their P&C divestiture isDiamondcutter-1/7/1999
1929 Must be a buyer. Can't see anyother reason for this big move up. Terror-1/7/1999
1928 I was thinking it was more of "leave sleeping babies alone". I got PatiBob-1/5/1999
1927 Be careful. I'm hearing that the new Oxford management still has no good hadwc-1/5/1999
1926 Funny nobody cares to check on the thread, maybe it's a good sign, OXHP runBluestryp-1/5/1999
1925 Oxford, is static for now. Probably will stay that way until tax loss selling iTerror-12/22/1998
1924 No activity on this thread for awhile... I take this for a concensus (which inHarlock-12/22/1998
1923 We have a ways to go before we hit 40's. Probably will have to retrace the Terror-12/8/1998
1922 Marcie, I guess it's true, no pain, no gain. We suffered long enough! Gene Bluestryp-12/8/1998
1921 congrats, MmG. 40+ in 99 ? Regards, HarlockHarlock-12/7/1998
1920 Marcie- I am watching and enjoying. Tony Tony van Werkhooven-12/7/1998
1919 Where is everybody. Out celebrating the return of Lazarous? Well I'm dancinTerror-12/7/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News