SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Young and Older Folk Portfolio
An SI Board Since April 2021
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
28704 498 0 SLV
Emcee:  chowder Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
19438@dan1944 I like the idea of focussing on technology (given your situation). QTI on SI-8/13/2025
19437Nice.... Good luck to both of us!! I've liked it so far, though I am down macbolan-8/13/2025
19436@jritz0 Thanks for some alternate ideas. I'll look into SCHG as it has come QTI on SI-8/13/2025
19435I don't disagree with anything you wrote but believe there are some differenSmart_Asset18/13/2025
19434RE: SMH That would be too narrow of a focus for me. I would at least expand myjritz018/13/2025
19433Re. If I were at your young age, a $50K SMH investment into my ROTH would be a QTI on SI-8/13/2025
19432RE: Is AI profitable? Amara's Law suggests that “We tend to overestimate thDas Kapital18/13/2025
19431If I were at your young age, a $50K SMH investment into my ROTH would be a no-brMax2.018/13/2025
19430Yes, I understand the value of Lidar sight for robots/machines going forward. Max2.038/13/2025
19429My question to the group: How would you feel about dropping 50K into SMH right ndan194428/13/2025
19428I vote it don't make no difference 10 years down the road Studies have shownpeterad18/13/2025
19427Folks, I need a little help. Earlier this week, I finished rolling over my entirQTI on SI-8/13/2025
19426Not sure you can directly connect those dots, though I agree that subsidizing a dan1944-8/13/2025
19425Re: Where our government paid INTC $75,000 each to lay people off. Not sure yoSeeksQuality28/13/2025
19424Re: As opposed to the "chip act"???> The CHIPS act was a more conSeeksQuality18/13/2025
19423Re: Not to mention there is more political control over the industry now. ISeeksQuality18/13/2025
19422Where our government paid INTC $75,000 each to lay people off. Stipulation thaSteve Felix-8/13/2025
19421And he (POTUS) has turned the careful planning of companies historically led by dan194428/13/2025
19420Is AI profitable? Not to mention there is more political control over the indusWaitress18/13/2025
19419Thoughts on OUST going forward?cajman1-8/13/2025
19418for those interested in the Gartner Hype Cycle 2025 for AI gartner.comOneDonatoOne-8/13/2025
19417One “pick and shovel” AI company was brought to this board by SmartAsset severalMax Fletcher68/13/2025
19416I agree Looking at Forge Global where you can invest in companies pre-public, thpeterad28/13/2025
19415Is AI profitable? nytimes.com Just as in the dot.com boom, the initial profit SeeksQuality48/13/2025
19414Unlike in previous months or even recent years, my heavily oriented conservativeJust Fine18/12/2025
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News