SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Lucent Technologies (LU)
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
21876 377 0 LU
Emcee:  MRE Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
19451Dude, I was checking out the Chevy Rangers...They look kinda' cool...10K a day-3/14/2002
19450Dude it's just confustion...Some big dude is gonna' puke before it's10K a day-3/14/2002
19449Well, I've watched many a scenerio over the years concerning different ways Sabrejet-3/14/2002
19448you would think with 27 billion in revenue...Somebody could probably take some t10K a day-3/14/2002
19447NT Dropping like Chevy truck!Softechie-3/14/2002
19446But it sure help in depressed time like this.Softechie-3/14/2002
19445>Being long this week sure has been fun.....oh boy! Convertibles are evil Gee10K a day-3/14/2002
19444Yeah, but the saying goes, bulls, bears and PIGS! Pigs get slaughtered. I guesSabrejet-3/14/2002
19443That dilution from say $6 to me should have brought the stock down to around $5.Sabrejet-3/14/2002
19442<If the convert is already completed what reason is there left to short otherBWAC-3/14/2002
19441re:"<i>IF the telco market was still heathy, LU would have 5% market Sabrejet-3/14/2002
19440Most of the people that wanted to arb the convert probably shorted the stock yesGVTucker-3/14/2002
19439If the convert is already completed what reason is there left to short other thaSabrejet-3/14/2002
19438I understood the math but I assumed something and realized it after I had postedSabrejet-3/14/2002
19437Sabrejet, RE: <i>Question: "On the borrowed money an arb might pay GVTucker-3/14/2002
19436Thanks for the comparison. Question: "On the borrowed money an arb might paSabrejet-3/14/2002
19435The way I understand it is the following. The buyers of the notes hedge their posylvester80-3/14/2002
19434<b>Lehman on telecom </b> Lehman issued a broad survey of the teleSoftechie-3/14/2002
19433I think you're a bit confused, Sabre. An arb buys $1mm of the convert and sGVTucker-3/14/2002
19432The problem with that is the arbs lose all the way around. If the conversion wasSabrejet-3/14/2002
19431DiB, RE: <i>Could you describe in details, how the process of "obtaGVTucker-3/14/2002
19430Softie softie softie.. Why is it that wherever you choose to hang your hat the Paul A-3/14/2002
19429hmmPaul A-3/14/2002
19428I am sure this name 'telecomguy' is a shame for the entire industry. I tJoe S Pack-3/13/2002
19427Telecomguy if you have any brain you would see that wireless sector is off 30% sSoftechie-3/13/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):