SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Lucent Technologies (LU)
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
21876 377 0 LU
Emcee:  MRE Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
19476OT----------Sylv, Just want to let ya know I appreciate your sharing your thougPaxb2u-3/15/2002
19475Which one will bite the dust first? LU or NT? Biting the dust means, being forceelmatador-3/15/2002
19474Lucent's new core TMX 880 ships, features integrated control plane for ATM, Kenneth E. Phillipps-3/15/2002
19473Well, tomorrow is another day!Anonymous-3/14/2002
19472GVTucker, Re:<<The under $5 restriction for mutual funds was commonplace stock bull-3/14/2002
19471The under $5 restriction for mutual funds was commonplace several years ago, butGVTucker-3/14/2002
19470I bought into CORV recently at $1.50. Any other questions? And no i don't telecomguy-3/14/2002
19469Elmatador, by Charter, some Mutual Funds aren't allowed to buy or hold stockstock bull-3/14/2002
19468Thanks for clarifying. I think you were talking apples and I was talking orangeSawtooth-3/14/2002
19467AFAIK, stocks below $5 are not marginable for marginable equity calculations forsylvester80-3/14/2002
19466<<No problem holding stocks below $5 as long as you are buying them with cSawtooth-3/14/2002
19465No problem holding stocks below $5 as long as you are buying them with cash. Yousylvester80-3/14/2002
19464sylvester80: <<. I think once this is over, by next week, we should be baFNS-3/14/2002
19463I can recall a rule that shares below 5 can't held by some investors. Can soelmatador-3/14/2002
19462I did as well.sylvester80-3/14/2002
19461Just added some more today at 4.77 and 4.83 . Hope, this shell pass away soon toJoe S Pack-3/14/2002
19460I think you are correct. I also wrote in my previous message, IMO there is stillsylvester80-3/14/2002
19459Today, there is still what seems to be a tremendous amount of pressure on the stSabrejet-3/14/2002
19458GV can probably answer this better but I'll take a stab at it. Considering tsylvester80-3/14/2002
19457Have you looked at CSCO's float lately?sylvester80-3/14/2002
19456The street always gets overdone on both sides. And this is way overdone on the ssylvester80-3/14/2002
19455GV, That is true only it is run by guys who does not have PhD and did not receJoe S Pack-3/14/2002
19454Sabrejet, RE: <i>The retail guy gets smoked in a situation like this whiGVTucker-3/14/2002
19453Impristine, you got me on that! I have no idea what you meant. All those degreesSabrejet-3/14/2002
19452Thanks, GV. <eom>DiB-3/14/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News