SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
SCHWAB IPO ALERT THREAD
An SI Board Since April 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2276 41 0
Emcee:  Topannuity Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1951 Gordon: Where do you find the allocation information you cited? Is it publiclyGuy E. Fleming-12/12/1999
1950 Jay: Most likely 660 customers got shares not 60 as you keep saying. The "Guy E. Fleming-12/12/1999
1949 >>If only 60 people are going to get shares (regardless of how Chuck diviLabrador-12/12/1999
1948 Hi everyone! Have been reading your posts regarding Schwab IPO's and thoughjim12345-12/12/1999
1947 Ummm Trader, that's not a thread, but rather an earnings report for a littlCarl R.-12/12/1999
1946 DaYooper: You know, that is my story exactly. Schwab was making up to $500/daTrader J-12/11/1999
1945 The 66,000 figure I got from someone's post (yours?). I got the 9000 figurjay silberman-12/11/1999
1944 In one article about the new IB a Schwab executive is quoted as saying they hopGordon Gekko-12/11/1999
1943 There is no way 9,000 people received affirmation calls because if they did theGordon Gekko-12/11/1999
1942 Of course it would mirror the aftermarket. But you would pay the IPO price, pluCarl R.-12/11/1999
1941 I believe the same Mr. Or What I spoke to said that 9000 people got affirmed. jay silberman-12/11/1999
1940 Jay, i would guess that the 6600 shares went to 660 people. The Platinum teamsLarryCPA-12/11/1999
1939 "Charles Schwab himself? Or what?" The latter. I think you need tjay silberman-12/11/1999
1938 I agree. Vigorous writing and Emails. I don't want every IPO (well actualcapitalistbeatnik-12/11/1999
1937 You don't want a Dutch Auction. Andover aside, there is no point, since itcapitalistbeatnik-12/11/1999
1936 VISX, how about this system: Depending on your level you get x many points per Carl R.-12/11/1999
1935 >>Continuing to satisfy a handful of "key clients" at the expenLabrador-12/11/1999
1934 >>The question is - Is it better that no one gets any shares, or just a fjayray-12/11/1999
1933 VISXBull, would you mind clarifying what you mean by the "new" systemjohn douglas-12/11/1999
1932 Perhaps Schwab is keeping most of the shares in a "hot" IPO offering Guy Gadois-12/11/1999
1931 <i>The question is - Is it better that no one gets any shares, or just a DaYooper-12/11/1999
1930 Vicki, Why not both!! Ameritrade might not have a minimum. They may be lotteryLarryCPA-12/11/1999
1929 >>We are being teased with ipos that we really have no chance of getting.Labrador-12/11/1999
1928 Let me think out loud for a moment. If Ameritrade will have equal access to IPOSam2482-12/11/1999
1927 Visx, I was just suggesting an account at Wit with Schab platinum criteria. I dLarryCPA-12/11/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News