SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Lucent Technologies (LU)
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
21876 377 0 LU
Emcee:  MRE Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
19576Lucent Lays on More Lambdas MARCH 20, 2002 PREVIOUS OFC NEWS ANALYSIS (FromDavid Hansen-3/20/2002
19575She might be pretty good at moving around to her benefit, but perhaps pales nextJohn Koligman-3/20/2002
19574Huge reversal on very high volume. IMO, bottom is in.sylvester80-3/20/2002
19573Agreed. Closed at the low yesterday, dive at the open and V bounced higher in grsylvester80-3/20/2002
19572I got a few more shares @4.17. It looks as though we may have put in a bottom...Sabrejet-3/20/2002
19571Another heavy volume day. Yesterday and today do to be the capitulation phase. Asylvester80-3/20/2002
19570David: <i>This won't be turning around overnight....</i> AgreeJohn Curtis-3/20/2002
19569Nortel and Lucent still losing market share to Ericsson and others. Ericsson ReKenneth E. Phillipps-3/20/2002
19568She was lucky she jumped ships before, wasn't she?elmatador-3/20/2002
19567Shareholder = Innocentelmatador-3/20/2002
19566I see Carly's old company is doing well... Boy, did those headhunters do thstockman_scott-3/19/2002
19565John, I agree. This won't be turning around overnight. I see this as an exceDavid Hansen-3/19/2002
19564The brain trust at Bell Labs would be spun off as a subsidiary called Docents? JJohn Soileau-3/19/2002
19563It's not much of a leap from there to nosense. Charles Tutt (SM)Charles Tutt-3/19/2002
19562How things change... As I recall LU paid more than it's current total worthJohn Koligman-3/19/2002
19561<<Nocent, perhaps? >> Yeah, that would be a good description of theJohn Soileau-3/19/2002
19560Nocent, perhaps?elmatador-3/19/2002
19559That was an interesting post, which is why I brought it over here from the NT thJohn Soileau-3/19/2002
19558<<Why they didn't accept ALA's offer?>> Hey elmatador, a cJohn Soileau-3/19/2002
19557May 2001 Alcatel, Lucent Negotiate Final Details of $32 Billion Trans-Atlantic Delmatador-3/19/2002
19556May 2001 "Wall Street values Lucent at about $33 billion, down from $285 bielmatador-3/19/2002
19555Also Spracht Elmat Message 17155734elmatador-3/19/2002
19554Yea, but who is left to buy them? And who would want to buy them? ALA maybe? HecDolfan-3/19/2002
19553Market cap now down to $14.75 billion. It was once up there in the stratosphereAnonymous-3/19/2002
19552Claptonsguitar: <i>It's looking like capitulation to me. The volume hJohn Curtis-3/19/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):