SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Celera Genomics (CRA)
An SI Board Since April 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
746 59 0 CRA
Emcee:  Raymond Clutts Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
196 genomics will remain volatile for a while. i think the bottom we saw last weekwlheatmoon-3/24/2000
195 Sequencing The Fruit Fly Genome And What It Means In 90 years of study, the digao seng-3/24/2000
194 Anyone have thoughts on the pullback this afternoon? Was it the bios generally Stephen M. DeMoss-3/23/2000
193 The very same story happen to me and many others in 1987 and I was wiped out. luther yow-3/22/2000
192 A story about a story: cbs.marketwatch.comHighTech-3/22/2000
191 A story : boards.fool.comHighTech-3/22/2000
190 My, My, My, never thought I could book in a 45% return in 2 days. UnbelievablDanny-3/22/2000
189 The consistently socialist bent of the Clinton administration denuded the pharmRaymond Clutts-3/22/2000
188 Here is the full text of WSJ editorial by Venter that appeared in today's ewl9839-3/21/2000
187 Bought yesterday at 1271/2 and a little more at 88 this morning. Hope we hit thStephen M. DeMoss-3/21/2000
186 i think we might have a bottom in this sector...-g- nice buy...wlheatmoon-3/21/2000
185 <<have the fools made any comments?>> fool.com Anyway, not bad foDanny-3/21/2000
184 I called Celera today and talked to an "Ed Block" (I believe) in IR. Jeffry K. Smith-3/21/2000
183 As I stated before,On March 24 will be an article about the first ever mapping BigAppleBoy-3/21/2000
182 thanks Cobalt. i appreciate that a lot.Jerry Miller-3/21/2000
181 Not exactly an article, it's an "editorial" written by Craig VentIlaine-3/21/2000
180 can anyone confirm an article in today's Wall Street Journal on Page A26 coJerry Miller-3/21/2000
179 I don't believe they have changed their view yet, but I dont know if this iDanny-3/21/2000
178 have the fools made any comments?wlheatmoon-3/21/2000
177 Bought my first CRA at 88 today, will buy more at sub 60. This is still a Fool&Danny-3/21/2000
176 what a mess it's been in the biotech and particularly genome sector, eh? wlheatmoon-3/21/2000
175 I think the mo-mo players left some time ago, now it's the poor saps on marPuddleGlum-3/21/2000
174 The momentum players needed to be cleared out. It has been a shocking selloff, Steve Antonelli-3/21/2000
173 Well I jumped on today at 127 thinking I was getting in after the downdraft wasStephen M. DeMoss-3/20/2000
172 Some interesting WSJ articles from the GERN thread. (Thanks to Stuart Silen on Rob Pierce-3/16/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News