SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
FRANKLIN TELECOM (FCM)
An SI Board Since March 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2891 47 0 FCM
Emcee:  Seth L. Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1966 First of all, if I did own this company which you named and I don't nor havNoneyet-9/20/1999
1965 That is the only comments you can muster when confronted with hard cold facts. Noneyet-9/20/1999
1964 Thomas, Don't you own or are president of KEG A QUE a manufacturer of barbqJoe King-9/20/1999
1963 Listen up and listen carefully, I do not destroy your investment, the company iNoneyet-9/20/1999
1962 Keep up good work Desousa! The name calling, and character assasination shows lostmymoney-9/20/1999
1961 How are you going to blow up this thread? A stink-bomb, a loud fart, a suicide Alert-Inv.-9/20/1999
1960 Ted, Their intent is to discourage me from posting, period. Anyone who brings Noneyet-9/20/1999
1959 Attempting to destroy people's investments is far worse than name calling..David Colvin-9/20/1999
1958 It is because of the way people are treated here that I remain and I will be heNoneyet-9/20/1999
1957 I'm responding to his message, not his intent, which does seem suspect. I Ted M-9/20/1999
1956 <i>just like all the facts that fcm puts out in PRESS RELEASES, LIKE HOW David Colvin-9/20/1999
1955 I say all of us ignore this pesky insect DeSousa... All those caps, all those bAlert-Inv.-9/20/1999
1954 Ted....why do you give ANY credence to "pie-hole" ?? Why do you suppotaxgun-9/20/1999
1953 You are absolutely correct. It is in actuality 76%, and that 4% is a world of dNoneyet-9/20/1999
1952 And I'll do likewise and waste more time on you. Your item number 2 is anoNoneyet-9/20/1999
1951 <i>A tempest in a teapot is that what usat is ? At 80% of fcm's past David Colvin-9/20/1999
1950 I'll waste one more post on your education: 1. The AMOUNT of receivables Alert-Inv.-9/20/1999
1949 A tempest in a teapot is that what usat is ? At 80% of fcm's past years revNoneyet-9/20/1999
1948 This whole USAT-related crusade of yours is a tempest in a teapot. FCM won'Alert-Inv.-9/20/1999
1947 George, thank you for your response but where are the flaws you allude to? TheTed M-9/20/1999
1946 George, You have missed many of the fine points. You make reference to fcm'Noneyet-9/20/1999
1945 Ted - I find several flaws in much of Thomas's logic, as displayed on thisgeorge willse-9/20/1999
1944 i dont care. His pie-hole has a motive, and it won't be putting money in ytaxgun-9/20/1999
1943 I second that request. It's never a good idea to have such a large percentgeorge eberting-9/19/1999
1942 I'm long but find little fault with Thomas's logic. Can anyone here diTed M-9/19/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News