SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Lucent Technologies (LU)
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
21876 377 0 LU
Emcee:  MRE Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
19676Do you think NT and LU will live through Summer? I don't. There is nothing elmatador-3/27/2002
19675GV, Why would you not consider cash balances- $4.5B - and marketable security hbofp-3/27/2002
19674BWAC, RE: <i>I haven't looked real hard at LU debt recently. You sureGVTucker-3/27/2002
19673GV, I haven't looked real hard at LU debt recently. You sure had me thinkinBWAC-3/27/2002
19672bofp, RE: <i>You are of course considering ALL liabilities as Debt, whicGVTucker-3/27/2002
19671GV, As of Dec. 31, 2001, Long Term Debt = $3,262M [Nothing due until 2006!] Shbofp-3/27/2002
19670Not with NT's but with LU's.sylvester80-3/27/2002
19669What does a liquidation of NT have to do with the market cap of NT?GVTucker-3/27/2002
19668<i>Now how does the market cap of NT have anything to do at all with that sylvester80-3/27/2002
19667sylvester, RE: <i>And IMO, in this case, we are in the opposite extreme.GVTucker-3/27/2002
19666sylvester, RE: <i>BTW, where do you get total debt at $19 billion. You aGVTucker-3/27/2002
19665And IMO, in this case, we are in the opposite extreme. Where IMO, Lucent, the cosylvester80-3/27/2002
19664BTW, where do you get total debt at $19 billion. You are way off IMO. How about sylvester80-3/27/2002
19663You're talking about what happens to the company, not the stock. A good comGVTucker-3/27/2002
19662Cause the one that survives gets the spoils. ;-)sylvester80-3/27/2002
19661by me: <i>whether LU is a good investment or not has nothing to do with wGVTucker-3/27/2002
19660<i>I think future for NT is good.</i> Oh is that why NT sais they csylvester80-3/27/2002
19659<i>whether LU is a good investment or not has nothing to do with whether Nsylvester80-3/27/2002
19658<i>Can Nortel hurry up and just liquidate itself before year end?</i>Kenneth E. Phillipps-3/27/2002
19657First of all, book value of assets is irrelevant in this discussion. Many a comGVTucker-3/27/2002
19656You mean like Nortel? I bet this quarter their balance sheet will show they are sylvester80-3/27/2002
19655<b>Lucent Tech Inc. Reiterated `Buy' at Lazard Freres</b> quotesylvester80-3/27/2002
19654Total debt at LU is around $19 billion. If the enterprise value of LU declines GVTucker-3/27/2002
19653I think Nortel just hit a new 8 year low. Could be 11 year low. The chart is waysylvester80-3/27/2002
19652>The risk that LU goes to $0 is the risk that the enterprise value of LU goesDiB-3/27/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News