SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
T/FIF, a New Plateau
An SI Board Since February 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2243 64 0
Emcee:  scaram(o)uche Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1968Will the Iraqis be saying Thanks a year from now? Not according to the writers bBulbaMan-4/10/2003
1967Thank you Brits,... Thank you Americans,... Thank you the other plus 40 coalitiorusset-4/10/2003
1966>> Oh yeah. You might want to add, "thank-you, Brits!!!" <<scaram(o)uche-4/9/2003
1965Re: Brits It was the received wisdom a couple of weeks ago that Tony Blair had stom pope-4/9/2003
1964"1. Those who made "anti-war" out to be an "anti-troops"John Metcalf-4/9/2003
1963The view from an anti-war protestor: 1. Those who made "anti-war" ouscaram(o)uche-4/9/2003
1962>> Spectrum Pharmaceuticals (SPPI)>> Things are more or less going Icebrg-4/9/2003
1961Many thanks to Tom for tending the news today, among the many distractions. (eoscaram(o)uche-4/9/2003
1960Here's a Reuters blurb excerpt on the results..... <i>Abbott said it scaram(o)uche-4/9/2003
1959I'm wondering if CAT is worth a nibble on the Abbott results. They're trnigel bates-4/9/2003
1958<i>May the war end today</i> Looks as though we're just about tnigel bates-4/9/2003
1957KOSN, no apparent news and very lo volume normally, but that is quite a serious tom pope-4/9/2003
1956telk does seem to be tradeable from a $10+ to $13 range bound, picking up a few mopgcw-4/9/2003
1955Still up about 35-40%........ finance.yahoo.com The news was posted to this thscaram(o)uche-4/9/2003
1954Also have to get out of "I don't follow the stock or indication" rtuck-4/9/2003
1953In general..... from the veteran biotech investor's perspective..... onscaram(o)uche-4/9/2003
1952The TLK199 interim results, actually. But I was a bit late for anyone to set uptuck-4/9/2003
1951The TELK mechanism of the week? :-) Looks good to me, as they've finally lscaram(o)uche-4/9/2003
1950How about TELK's AACR related announcements? You've likely already seentuck-4/9/2003
1949good idea, done. thanks to Tuck for monitoring activities today! (eom)scaram(o)uche-4/8/2003
1948Would it be a real pain to ask for the portfolio links in the original post ? Lnigel bates-4/8/2003
19472K shares SQNM purchased for "2000" at current ask of 1.83. (eom)scaram(o)uche-4/8/2003
1946>> Should I err on the side of possibly passing on trivia, in case it turnscaram(o)uche-4/7/2003
1945WRT to finding "popes" perhaps a good place to start is with companiestuck-4/7/2003
1944Allan, I'm glad no offense taken, none meant. The addition of volume in thtuck-4/7/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):