ZOOM : is the Best / Most Underpriced Stock on Nasdaq

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
ZOOM : is the Best / Most Underpriced Stock on Nasdaq

An SI Board Since July 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
2493	10	0	ZOOM

Emcee: Roy	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1968	Thank you! One question... Which major brokerage houses follow Zoom? I would	Jasman	-	3/3/1998
1967	Upgrades... Zoomers might find the discussion between Scrapps and myself in th	Dick Smith	-	3/3/1998
1966	Hello, Sir, We normally don't set an earnings release date until right bef	fermin marco marcos	-	3/3/1998
1965	I may have made inaccurate statements... but ZOOM is still a bargain! This was	Jasman	-	3/2/1998
1964	Ooooooh. How much do I owe you for that?? <ggg>	David Lawrence	-	2/28/1998
1963	That was a good link, Shane. I was reading along, and started to think "w	David Lawrence	-	2/28/1998
1962	<i>(3Com) will end up in a stronger position than we had before. We have	Scrapps	-	2/28/1998
1961	ROK Propaganda: techweb.com (2:1 ratio of ROK 56KBps ports vs. others; "	shane forbes	-	2/28/1998
1960	Posted a snippet about how I was hoping that retailers would toss out the pre-s	shane forbes	-	2/28/1998
1959	Cheaper 56 Kbps modems coming from 3Com, MOT modem operations no buyers yet: te	shane forbes	-	2/28/1998
1958	<i>"What do you want me to explain?"</i> Nevermind...you	Scrapps	-	2/28/1998
1957	<i>>> Zoom appeals to both IBM and Mac consumers, which US Robotics	David Lawrence	-	2/28/1998
1956	What do you want me to explain? US Robotics needs updated drivers while Zoom m	Jasman	-	2/28/1998
1955	Now Jasman, you went and explained the wrong thing. It was this statement you	Scrapps	-	2/28/1998
1954	Let me explain... If Zoom and US Robotics was the same price, I would buy US R	Jasman	-	2/28/1998
1953	Jasman says: <i>"I am going to buy Zoom anyday over US Robotics. Wou	Scrapps	-	2/27/1998
1952	Zoom is moving along nicely... If it breaks $9, it can easily reach $10. I lik	Jasman	-	2/27/1998
1951	>>>Keep an eye on it over the next few quarters.<<< But, not	Scrapps	-	2/27/1998
1950	In the final final analysis the devil is not in the details but in the stock pr	shane forbes	-	2/27/1998
1949	Shane, I think you make some assumption you shouldn't. One item to be cons	Scrapps	-	2/27/1998
1948	Scrapps, that was a simple example of a worst case analysis to see how much the	shane forbes	-	2/27/1998
1947	Shane, in reading your post to David I find it a questionable business practice	Scrapps	-	2/27/1998
1946	David: I think this is being blown out of proportion - it may affect initial	shane forbes	-	2/27/1998
1945	David: Only way to compare the gross margin is to know what the previous chip	shane forbes	-	2/27/1998
1944	<i>>>At this time I see Zoom as a traders play and not an investor&	David Lawrence	-	2/27/1998

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):