SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Stop the War!
An SI Board Since March 2003
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21614 34 0
Emcee:  PartyTime Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
19689I am allowed to have bias - I am not a judgeAK2004-7/22/2003
19688re: <i>Since the conviction is uncontested, I don't think there's AK2004-7/22/2003
19687<i> better said late than never, I suppose.....</i> <b>GepharJames Calladine-7/22/2003
19686no :-))AK2004-7/22/2003
19685The picture of the Arch was sooooo appropriate gustave.... Fits right in with tNeeka-7/22/2003
19684You don't have an agenda? You have posted how many times over the past few rrufff-7/22/2003
19683At the conference table someone pulled out an apple. Did you have an apple handyjttmab-7/22/2003
19682I think we can close this out.... <i>but the point was that if the new thjttmab-7/22/2003
19681<i>What's the need to respond to constant resposting</i> You cojttmab-7/22/2003
19680I would let you be the judge since you obviously have no bias. Maybe I would alSirVinny-7/22/2003
19679re: <i>The "why" was correct <s></i> oh, well, can nAK2004-7/22/2003
19678<edited> the distance between 0 and a is a projection on x axis and the saAK2004-7/22/2003
19677I do not want to argue about Pollard's case because my info about is obviousAK2004-7/22/2003
19676What's the need to respond to constant resposting. You have an agenda whichrrufff-7/22/2003
19675<i>If that new theory is true then Pollard's sentence is too harsh<jttmab-7/22/2003
19674Since you never respond to it, there's no way to know whether you've evejttmab-7/22/2003
19673JT - do you really know how to do research or do you just know how to constantlyrrufff-7/22/2003
19672The "why" was correct <s>. Earth's orbit about the sun is ejttmab-7/22/2003
19671re: <i>I don't follow why that point, whether true or not, has a beariAK2004-7/22/2003
19670I bet it is the wrong answer but I'll try it anyway - the distance from the AK2004-7/22/2003
19669<i> Again, I have not been following the case so I would not defend Pollarjttmab-7/22/2003
19668re: <i>Pollard's compromise resulted in deaths of US agents in easternAK2004-7/22/2003
19667Pollard's compromise resulted in deaths of US agents in eastern block. jttmjttmab-7/22/2003
19666<i>I suspected that that might have been a trick question</i> "jttmab-7/22/2003
19665re: <i>"too severely" is a function of the specific act</i>AK2004-7/22/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News