SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
IMON - Quoted from Barron's Corporate Reports
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2220 10 0 IMON
Emcee:  Mr. Rhino Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1970 Gilder & Roadmaster by: uglybutrich 17018 of 17020 Excuse a schizophrenicJay Fisk-2/6/1999
1969 They've got a problem now. Too many shares to run it. Game over. Good guys Agenda-2/6/1999
1968 the reason dujour IMON went up Friday: exchange2000.com P&D at it's TradeOfTheDay-2/6/1999
1967 Mayo, earnings and revenues are not relevant for an Internet stock. They trade Roger A. Babb-2/6/1999
1966 I'd forecast between the 15th and 19th as the next scheduled PR is on the 2Jay Fisk-2/6/1999
1965 Roger that. of course it matters. We'll see the first filing under the new Ben Wa-2/6/1999
1964 Does it matter? Roger A. Babb-2/6/1999
1963 IMON is on a December fiscal year. anybody know when the 1998 final results wiBen Wa-2/6/1999
1962 jduffy, I downloaded the latest version of webzinger and ran some tests. Very gRoger A. Babb-2/6/1999
1961 Sometimes it's tough to get a grip on the big picture, I just hope the bottJay Fisk-2/6/1999
1960 The truth is obvious for those willing or able to see it. Agenda-2/6/1999
1959 They already showcased their "material" to the people that count. NotAgenda-2/6/1999
1958 Buddy, the phrase "irrational exuberance" comes to mind.Jeff-2/6/1999
1957 ImaginOn shares, IMON, became the darling of the daytrading crowd at the exact Jay Fisk-2/6/1999
1956 >>>>IMON's technology has already been assessed by the market aBuddyW-2/6/1999
1955 OK, Cindy...I've had enough. I guess you want to go back where you were beBen Wa-2/6/1999
1954 <It seems that I don't need to explain this to you> No, you need to Agenda-2/6/1999
1953 If a company licenses its technology to other companies in return for a flat feBuddyW-2/6/1999
1952 <My contention is that the patents are a relevant factor when deciding to inAgenda-2/6/1999
1951 Would that be 1) hogwash, as in, investing in a company for the patents is a baBuddyW-2/6/1999
1950 HOGWASH. Agenda-2/6/1999
1949 I could tell from the Cindy Crawford search. BuddyW-2/6/1999
1948 I....am deep. Ben Wa-2/6/1999
1947 Gee, that sounds like a deeply held opinion. fqwiii... BuddyW-2/6/1999
1946 so uh this zinger guy, heard about the space-time continuum. Relativity and stBen Wa-2/6/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):