SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
ATPG Shareholders
An SI Board Since August 2012
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3620 77 0 ATPG
Emcee:  alertmeipp Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1970Here is a link to one of the documents you mention, this one happens to be with Kramer38311/19/2012
1969I'll let Isgur sort it out. Certainly, ATP is not going to pretend that theybillgatesisevil-11/19/2012
1968I think they had them in leverage stats at one point. And if they are financingRobohogs-11/19/2012
1967I think that is what Isgur is referring to when he talks about going outside of billgatesisevil111/19/2012
1966I am not sure how that even looks like an equity interest and wonder if the publRobohogs-11/19/2012
1965Here is one problematical transaction that could be voided. The estate could be billgatesisevil111/19/2012
1964I like the idea of a 100% bounce instead.. ;-)Flipper2058-11/19/2012
196310-20% bounce in many juniors. JonRobohogs-11/19/2012
1962That is my take on the situation too. Who will step up and do an equity infusionbillgatesisevil-11/19/2012
1961The bonds seem to be settling out, although at the low to date. I assume this fiFlipper2058-11/19/2012
1960That is my read at the moment. billgatesisevil111/19/2012
1959Most welcome, but I am trying to figure this guy out. You have been a great helpbillgatesisevil-11/19/2012
1958Thanks, Bill. Much appreciated. Looks like DIP won't push this to Ch. 7 yetalertmeipp-11/18/2012
1957Bill, MANY thanks again for your incredible work you share here.Flipper2058111/18/2012
1956I think it is most reasonable. It puts aside money for A&P but does not costbillgatesisevil311/18/2012
1955Bill, what's your take on BOEM settlement. One uncertainty removed if this alertmeipp-11/18/2012
1954It seems to be turning out that some, at least, of the ORRIs and NPIs were put tbillgatesisevil-11/18/2012
1953Argh, changed though in mid sentence. Documents are, not documents is.billgatesisevil-11/18/2012
1952They basically have. That is what docket 747 and other similar ones is all aboutbillgatesisevil311/18/2012
1951why would the DIP, 2nd lien, unsecured not going all over them ASAP? For all thoalertmeipp-11/17/2012
1950For him to call it, he will be required to have a docket to call it over. Right billgatesisevil-11/17/2012
1949why you think it will take this long? He sounded like u want to call it soon.alertmeipp-11/17/2012
1948In many ways it seems like an easy thing to figure out...if the collateral is baFlipper2058-11/17/2012
1947I imagine that if he believes these are financings that he could have them be seRobohogs111/17/2012
1946No, months anyway.billgatesisevil-11/17/2012
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News