SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Intermagnetics (IMG)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3448 16 0 IMG
Emcee:  Gregg Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1973 I missed that first time around...Looks interesting.Gerald Thomas-7/28/1997
1972 I absolutely think you should send it to them. I also think I will attend the sMark Shaw-7/28/1997
1971 This chain bought freeze 12 and was passing it off as r-12... I'm debatingGerald Thomas-7/28/1997
1970 Schenectady woos Latham factory MARV CERMAK Staff writer 384 WordGerald Thomas-7/28/1997
1969 You have to go through estimates on demand and then have to set up a password..Gerald Thomas-7/28/1997
1968 Gerald, where do you go from there? I tried, and I was reuired for the passJoyan X-7/28/1997
1967 I think it's very reasonable ...but they have to start with this quarter...Gerald Thomas-7/27/1997
1966 Gerald: I don't think they will be coming out with negative news. However,Mark Shaw-7/27/1997
1965 In my opinion, Preston, Wall Street is waiting for evidence that FRIGC is penetMark Shaw-7/27/1997
1964 The numbers that count are sales and earnings and showing progress in those aredowman-7/27/1997
1963 The numbers are not "meaningless", they are "facts", somethSteve in Vegas-7/27/1997
1962 I would say there is just as much chance this stock will go up as it will go doGerald Thomas-7/26/1997
1961 Meaningless... why would a short want to cover. Fear of a buying panic,good mandowman-7/26/1997
1960 IMG short interest 821,548 shares versus 874,418 a month ago.Steve in Vegas-7/26/1997
1959 2 reports by analysts this morning 1 neutral 1 extremely positive. You may wanGerald Thomas-7/25/1997
1958 Finally an UP day...do the market people know something? NOT touting, just deprPreston Lurie-7/25/1997
1957 I probably won't get completely out but I am thinking about seriously reducMark Shaw-7/25/1997
1956 Mark: I agree, with you 110% these guys have had it made with only having to seSummer Wind-7/25/1997
1955 Gerald: I hope they are right. We'll see. Too bad IMG can't spell thisMark Shaw-7/25/1997
1954 Mark- Just read BOTH firstcall reports... one is neutral to slightly negativeGerald Thomas-7/25/1997
1953 I agree. Now we can eagerly await the slick annual report telling us what a greMark Shaw-7/25/1997
1952 I'm not really sure...but if even so it is just a detail compared to this oGerald Thomas-7/25/1997
1951 Correct me if I'm wrong. Since IMG closed below 11 after the earnings annouMark Shaw-7/25/1997
1950 I know what you are saying but I'm nearing the end of the rope on this one.Mark Shaw-7/25/1997
1949 How could he call this stock significantly undervalued ? It has a P/E of aroundMark Shaw-7/25/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):