SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Lucent Technologies (LU)
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
21876 377 0 LU
Emcee:  MRE Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
19751What I am trying to inform is that incumbency is no guarantee of survival. And telmatador-3/29/2002
19750Some gloom and doom for Nortel from Lightreading. lightreading.com MARCH 27, 2sylvester80-3/29/2002
19749Old news. What do you think cut LU from 6.8 down to 4.1? This is very old news.sylvester80-3/29/2002
19748Wrong. The street capitulates at least 6 months ahead. Bottom is already in for sylvester80-3/29/2002
19747I didn't know Harley Davidson, Pan Am, Brandiff and Burroughs were in the tesylvester80-3/29/2002
19746Qwest was the new kid in the block BEFORE they bought US West.sylvester80-3/29/2002
19745Whoa! Did the magazine really report this? >...Lucent's managers are sizDiB-3/29/2002
19744Lucent Faces Challenges in Becoming Profitable, Magazine Says By Samantha Zee MKenneth E. Phillipps-3/29/2002
19743<<we had capitulation in telecoms,>> Capitulation has not yet finishelmatador-3/29/2002
19742Pan Am was an Incumbent. Braniff was an incumbent. Burrroughs was an incumbent. elmatador-3/29/2002
19741sylvester, RE: <i>Q is the new kid on the block and nowhere near as goodGVTucker-3/29/2002
19740Q is the new kid on the block and nowhere near as good shape as the baby bells (sylvester80-3/29/2002
19739You know Alex, I'm probably wrong about the Cisco licensing. I had probably David Hansen-3/29/2002
19738<i>They said the same about the new GX's and L3s and Qs... That they wGVTucker-3/29/2002
19737<i>A set of companies that emerge. Khosla is not telling that the incumbensylvester80-3/29/2002
19736I bet you would have said the exact opposite during NAZ 5100. You would have beesylvester80-3/29/2002
19735Cisco's IOS? Dave, I'd like to see confirmation that LU has licensed IOAlex Chilton-3/29/2002
19734Lucent Tech (LU) 4.73 +0.39: Friedman Billings Ramsey upgraded to BUY from AccumRon-3/29/2002
19733Typical. In bubble times people who was talking up stocks drowned people who hadelmatador-3/29/2002
19732Bandwidth +Overcapacity Thread: Most laid fiber will just rot underground. Meselmatador-3/29/2002
19731What has -siginificantly changed from last month when the article was published?elmatador-3/29/2002
19730I can do that. Like keeping posting here every six months my take on how this iselmatador-3/29/2002
19729<i>Rene Carayol CEO of the <b>Voodoo Group</b>???</i> Isylvester80-3/28/2002
19728I suggest you read this. Not only is it not old, but it is also much closer to rsylvester80-3/28/2002
19727Not only is it old, it's also from freaking Britain: <i>"millionssylvester80-3/28/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):