SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Techniclone (TCLN)
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3702 23 0 TCLN
Emcee:  cjgaddy Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1977 I'm new to TCLN (bought during recent flurry at 1.56, 1.68, 2.00)new to bielepet-5/31/1998
1976 Hi Maurice, The purely logical angle of reverse splits that you presented in yEPS-5/31/1998
1975 I'm glad you said it... Dixie7777-5/30/1998
1974 Shero, 3 cents on Techniclone at $1.50 is about 2% spread. I checked IDEC, CouMaurice Winn-5/30/1998
1973 Thank you for your apology to Davis. I apologized to you awhile back for a statjohn dixon-5/30/1998
1972 If asking for documentation of claims that appear contrary to fact means I'Bob L-5/30/1998
1971 Thank you Jack, Maurice and all you e-mailers. Some people are so stuck in a ruEZLibra-5/30/1998
1970 Last I checked the spread on TCLN was 1/32 or $0.03125, with trades on instanetshero-5/30/1998
1969 Now with Maurice, every yahoo can tell what parts are his opinion. Crystal cleaBob L-5/29/1998
1968 Davis would be a little more deserving of your accolades if he would refrain frBob L-5/29/1998
1967 Share amalgamation Reason number 6: Spreads are narrower on higher priced stocMaurice Winn-5/29/1998
1966 Shero, I don't like your attack on Davis ONE BIT. He's a man who has ecjgaddy-5/29/1998
1965 You and Terry have it exactly right. Thank you. shero-5/29/1998
1964 That's very close to reality, Terry, at least as I remember it when I sat aEZLibra-5/29/1998
1963 I picked this up on another thread. Although it doesn't deal with TCLN per Terry D.-5/29/1998
1962 www.techniclone.com, all the answers you could hope for in far more depth and cknucklehead 87-5/28/1998
1961 The Duke study apparently was a Phase I involving surgery to remove most of theTim K-5/28/1998
1960 I don't dislike Davis. I've never met, or spoken to him. Davis dislikshero-5/28/1998
1959 Davis, your brief one-sentence dismissal of the Duke trials makes me nervous. Jim Baker-5/28/1998
1958 Thanks for the more thoughtful response. A few points: I don't think it isBob L-5/28/1998
1957 Bob, I never said you hyped IDPH/CLTR. I said maybe you could explain their hypEZLibra-5/28/1998
1956 Davis, I asked you a straighforward question. Can you support your statement iBob L-5/28/1998
1955 Thanks Davis, I've been going through all my news clippings as I knew the nTerry D.-5/28/1998
1954 Dr. Dvorak sits on TCLN Scientific Advisory Board. He also discovered vegf (vasEZLibra-5/28/1998
1953 Cancer convention. Why does the name Harold Dvorak ring a bell? biz.yahoo.com Terry D.-5/28/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):