SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
198048 1047 8 QCOM
Emcee:  Silcon Observer Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
197712Slightly OT: How many GW of coal powered generation sits idle within in the US? waitwatchwander1February 15
197711Not necessarily. It has to be just as hard hiding plans going into the productiwaitwatchwander1February 15
197710Some power and energy perspectives to add to the data center mix. 100MW = 25,0060HzEE12February 15
197709once again this is all about expected features - no statements of fact the featuOptntrdr19994February 15
197708Yes, I saw that a while ago and it might well be true. I do believe Pu has a miwaitwatchwander-February 15
197707I think the Pro has to be Pro so if C2 isn't up to that standard then I'waitwatchwander-February 15
197706Lets hope it is true so we can now start to move forward without this cloud of ufreefromwires2February 15
197705A big FWIW: iPhone 18 Pro, Pro Max, and Fold to Feature A20 Pro, 12GB RAM, and Amanning181February 15
197704That is not what is being said in the media. Do you think the media is wrong andtomychagrin-February 15
197703Qualcomm's 128 bit Hexagon extensions share.google The 128-bit extensions waitwatchwander1February 14
197702Should Qualcomm buy Imagination? share.google Directed learning if one scrollswaitwatchwander1February 14
197701Waiting sounds like a securities violation of not announcing material informatioJGoren4February 13
197700because reverse engineering doesnt deliver the work around - as for the license Optntrdr19992February 13
197699Because its in 'Cuper-in-tino.' Or wait a minute. They moved the campu60HzEE-February 13
197698If Apple can reverse engineer anything they want, where is their cutting edge mosbfm6February 13
197697aapl can reverse engineer anything they want - so the idea that they need qcom tOptntrdr19992February 13
197696Apple could chose/want to stay with the X80; Q, however, isn't obligated to sbfm2February 13
197695sbfm, Re: Any SA under which Q continues to fund Apple-centric R&D needs a ryhack-February 13
197694and : the Phony from Omaha says Apple Crapple is just GREATJon Koplik-February 13
197693beause they say they will - even when they all know they cantOptntrdr1999-February 13
197692Apple can’t even get their chatbot to work well. Why do people think its going tfreefromwires2February 13
197691I think we all agree that Apple will reup the license agreement. Q has no maneuvsbfm6February 13
197690the memory issue and the architecture structure in AAPl is going to require a piOptntrdr19991February 13
197689Copilot on when QCOM would announce an extension with Apple if Apple signs in MaRKnight1February 13
197688OT, ore on the ending of free AI: Claude used to allow half a dozen detailed queA.J. Mullen-February 13
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News