SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
komag
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
848 11 0 KMAG
Emcee:  scott blomquist Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
198 Hi James Was that blub of news reported bu Reurers or some other news agenVladimir Zelener-10/9/1996
197 Vladimir I think you're right, the stock went up as a result of what JohnsoJames B. Barnes-10/9/1996
196 Hi Robert I have connected to Komag web site to see if there was a press relVladimir Zelener-10/9/1996
195 Robert, I get reuters news from my account at ETRADE. Don't know if you goDaniel K.-10/9/1996
194 Daniel, My view on KMAG matches yours. Check out my post #171 on this thread. Robert Schling-10/8/1996
193 Vladimir, My interpretation of the Reuters news release was exactly like yoursRobert Schling-10/8/1996
192 Hi, Robert I am a bit confused. The message from Reuters which you quote staVladimir Zelener-10/7/1996
191 Robert- FYI: Komag's Q3 earnings warning estimated Q3 to be between .30-.5Daniel K.-10/3/1996
190 Gary, are you still there? I don't understand the heavy volume today and KMRobert Schling-10/3/1996
189 If have read from Komag's press release and analyst's estimates betweenGARY SIKORSKI-9/26/1996
188 Any thoughts out there on Q3?Brent D. Beal-9/24/1996
187 IF I recall from reviewing Bloomberg, I think Paine Webber has KMAG an accumulGARY SIKORSKI-9/21/1996
186 To Komag followers: I recently stumbled on this site and am glad to see so mucMichael Tran-9/20/1996
185 FYI, Fidelity Investments has them rated a 5 and Stars Ranking was a 5 also inPuneet Sharma-9/18/1996
184 Komag had been downgraded from 1 (Buy) to a 2 (Attractive) in recent (i.e., SepDon Additon-9/18/1996
183 ROBERT, KMAG up on Sept. 17 due to a buy recommendation by Paine Webber and reGARY SIKORSKI-9/17/1996
182 Gary, Looks like we're in the same situation. My entry point was 32 1/4 anRobert Schling-9/15/1996
181 ZACKS is a short-term, 3 month indicator. Should rise after 3Q or 4Q results arGARY SIKORSKI-9/14/1996
180 The press release was a surprise, but if you read their entire 2Q press releaseGARY SIKORSKI-9/14/1996
179 As of Friday the 13th, your prediction is right! I bought 100 @19.25 to offset GARY SIKORSKI-9/14/1996
178 I can live with everything you suggest. I'll try and add a few thoughts laJames B. Barnes-9/13/1996
177 Hi James Let me sugest the alternative to your rosy scenario for Komag. KomagVladimir Zelener-9/13/1996
176 I suspect they factor in analyst's future eps expectations, and future guidJames B. Barnes-9/12/1996
175 Hi James I agree with you that Zack's ratings sometimes are very inaccurVladimir Zelener-9/12/1996
174 Somebody correct me if I'm wrong because I'm just going by personal obsJames B. Barnes-9/10/1996
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News