SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
NOTES
An SI Board Since November 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2505 131 0
Emcee:  Didi Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1980Tried to PM you but apparently you have PMs turned off. I have the thread bTimF-7/12/2002
1979Didi, A little on the late side, but I always read your Notes. Thanks again foIA-7/11/2002
1978Good find Di. I had read both author's books and found the article a good Jack Hartmann-7/9/2002
1977Tony Dwyer I want to throw a comment in here on the political environment as itJack Hartmann-7/9/2002
1976<b>Pru</b>'s Yardeni: "..market may remain undervalued for Didi-7/8/2002
1975Update: "Honoring the Defiant One" washingtonpost.com >>>BDidi-7/8/2002
1974Thx much, Mulholl & soar. eomDidi-7/8/2002
1973<font color=green>Pru's Yardeni: "Stock Valuation Model" + Didi-7/8/2002
1972Didi, a favorite bookmark......thanks......soar-7/7/2002
1971i'm sorry i missed that... but fyi..."bookmarked"MulhollandDrive-7/5/2002
1970Thanks, Tim. Isn't Zeev amazing? Quite a bright, genuine and generous geDidi-7/5/2002
1969Hi Didi, just saw your message. cannot pm, so.... you are bookmarked <g>! TimeToMakeTheInvs-7/5/2002
1968Thanks, nice effort... However, I have my own calculations based on S&P staDidi-7/5/2002
1967pvz's <b>S&P Valuation ("Fed Model") using latest operatThe Ox-7/5/2002
1966"<b>Fed Model</b>" & stats... #reply-17451364 drsohn.Didi-7/4/2002
1965Oops, stand corrected... "Thumbs Up, or Thumbs Down, on Stocks? Siegel &amDidi-7/4/2002
1964"Stocks Revisited: <b>Siegel & Shiller Debate</b>" kDidi-7/4/2002
1963Thanks, Jack. The responses more than satisfied my curiosity. Happy 4th. DiDidi-7/4/2002
1962Can't figure out how to send you a PM or e-mail, but I do have your "NOJack T. Pearson-7/4/2002
1961<font color=green><i>NOTES readership poll</i> is now closed. Didi-7/4/2002
1960"<b>New Life Expectancy Tables</b> For Figuring Retirement DistDidi-7/3/2002
1959Zeev has since revised that to 1326, which we came close enough to today.SirRealist-7/3/2002
1958Kev, newsmax.com Zeev's comment on Sir John's article: #reply-1556440Didi-7/3/2002
1957Much appreciated, Kev. Have a good holiday :o)! eomDidi-7/3/2002
1956Sir John is always worth paying attention to. Thanks for that one!SirRealist-7/3/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News