SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
ATIS is on the move!
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2205 22 0 ATIS
Emcee:  Rick Costantino Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1980 I guess I do like talking to myself. But ATIS IS right on schedule. Now 3 15/Bruce L-1/13/2000
1979 ATIS now at 3 5/16 bid and there has been some selling at this level. Very norBruce L-1/13/2000
1978 ATIS may have just broken out!! Stock now at 3 7/16 ask. Look at a chart. ATBruce L-1/13/2000
1977 <<Don't I just love these conversations with myself?>> No. BBruce L-1/12/2000
1976 Don't you love having these conversations with yourself? Just hang tight, Gary Hoyer-1/12/2000
1975 Re: Wednesday Morning Selling Significant selling early on this morning. ManBruce L-1/12/2000
1974 Some selling has come in, including blocks as big as 11,000. ATIS is back downBruce L-1/11/2000
1973 ATIS may be breaking out. It's back to where it was before the news releasBruce L-1/11/2000
1972 Bruce and all(off topic), Have a happy new year. Regards, Marshall Marshall Teitelbaum-12/31/1999
1971 Stock now up 3/8s to 2 9/16 -5/8. Volume is strong st 332,000 10:49. If this Bruce L-12/29/1999
1970 <<it looks more like tax selling...>> I was away from my screen yeBruce L-12/29/1999
1969 Rick, Good points. Regarding the FDA, in the immortal words of Mel Brooks in Marshall Teitelbaum-12/28/1999
1968 Jeff, I can understand selling from an investment end, as infinite numbers of Marshall Teitelbaum-12/28/1999
1967 Well, I don't know what to think....2 1/4 seems like a good price but too mJeff Jordan-12/28/1999
1966 Marshall et al... During the ORG panel review, the FDA engaged in a little retrRick Strange-12/28/1999
1965 Bruce, Sorry, but I don't have the original numbers immediately handy. I Marshall Teitelbaum-12/27/1999
1964 Marshall, "Basically, although a relatively small study thus far, it appeBruce Long-12/27/1999
1963 Epro and Bruce, Thank you both for posting, and about ATIS. My apologies for Marshall Teitelbaum-12/26/1999
1962 Thank you EPro. Your post was very helpful in that I was myself lost over the Bruce L-12/26/1999
1961 "I just don't see how you can make money if you ignore a study that shEPro-12/25/1999
1960 off topic Rick, This was the entire post from Paul Shield to me: "MarsMarshall Teitelbaum-12/25/1999
1959 Yes, off topic and off color: Marshall, you should wash your mouth out with soaPaul Shield-12/25/1999
1958 off topic: Paul, If you refer to your post, 1948, your first post on this boaMarshall Teitelbaum-12/24/1999
1957 Rick, it wasn't you that I refer to, although I recall you also touted IMULPaul Shield-12/24/1999
1956 I may be the person in question since I still have a long position in IMUL. I dRick Strange-12/23/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News