SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
19807<i>Perhaps with a few other offenders.</i> No "perhaps" aLane3-8/25/2002
19806<i>I pointed this out to TP when he first started posting thinking that, aE-8/25/2002
19805<i>There is a difference between criticism and dissent and the retailing oE-8/25/2002
19804NOTHING? <b>NOTHING???!!!</b> I can barely see the keyboard throughLazarus_Long-8/25/2002
19803<i>"You have broken my heart.</i>" Which means nothing...Solon-8/25/2002
19802<i>I think we have to be very careful of his political leanings before we Lazarus_Long-8/25/2002
19801<i> I'm thinking that those who are affected by it on several threads Lazarus_Long-8/25/2002
19800I think we have to be very careful of his political leanings before we speak of Solon-8/25/2002
19799Laz, I'm beginning to think that perspectives on this are greatly influencedLane3-8/25/2002
19798<i>IMO it is, in fact, significant, in assessing whether his posts here shLazarus_Long-8/25/2002
19797<i>I thought it was to be run almost like GWB</i> If that's the Lazarus_Long-8/25/2002
19796<i>The one point I heard in the argument for banning TP was that his postLazarus_Long-8/25/2002
19795<i>No, he isn't unique on this thread, Laz. </i> Anyone besides Lazarus_Long-8/25/2002
19794<i>I thought it was to be run almost like GWB, except for a specific excluLane3-8/25/2002
19793I could not acess your link? What is your point? That only those who served injlallen-8/25/2002
19792Get a grip. I was being facetious to make a point....jlallen-8/25/2002
19791Have at it. I never said anyone had to stop criticizing the government. I'jlallen-8/25/2002
19790Criticism of the government is a different matter. There are plenty of things tjlallen-8/25/2002
19789There is no social grace in letting someone walk in and purposefully stink up thjlallen-8/25/2002
19788<i>Feigning ignorance is for wimps......</i> Suspension of notice iLane3-8/25/2002
19787I thought it was to be run almost like GWB, except for a specific exclusion of aE-8/25/2002
19786No, he isn't unique on this thread, Laz. He is just pushing your particular E-8/25/2002
19785I've read repeated reports of this recently. The US response should be to tLazarus_Long-8/25/2002
19784I disagree with Jewel fairly commonly too. Try this: Message 17915197 I also reLazarus_Long-8/24/2002
19783<< Senior members of the Saudi royal family paid hundreds of millions of dBridge Player-8/24/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News