SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
MSHE (MSH Entertainment)
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2706 10 0 MSHE
Emcee:  BOJO Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1981 Hope I'm right. I see today as the gigantic shakeout before the news. Buyigammaray-1/19/1999
1980 Well, I had one E-mailer say that we were all "lost in space". That&Sisofsix2-1/16/1999
1979 PSI is Pacific Securities International Inc. The are in Los Angeles and I do nobangit-1/16/1999
1978 Hello Recycle; >>The obvious question is now, who from and why should weSisofsix2-1/15/1999
1977 Not trying to be smart but i get the feeling many of the long longs are just abgammaray-1/14/1999
1976 Here is my analysis of the mysterious 144's. There is a difference btwn tabgammaray-1/14/1999
1975 Hello, Recycle; I am still trying to find those later 144's that were Sisofsix2-1/14/1999
1974 SIS, The obvious question is now, who from and why should we believe them. Somerecycle-1/14/1999
1973 Hello, Recycle; I received an interesting E-mail this morning which said: Sisofsix2-1/14/1999
1972 Back on April 2, 1998, there was the News Release generated by INTEL, in what wSisofsix2-1/13/1999
1971 I'm not sure what this is worth, but it appears Pacific International Securrecycle-1/13/1999
1970 I sent an E-mail to NATPE (last week) to see if they could give me a listing ofSisofsix2-1/13/1999
1969 Bangit: My recollection is that MSH Ent. had for some time a press release on Greger-1/13/1999
1968 That,s because there is none. the price ws to be set relative to market price. gammaray-1/13/1999
1967 I concur with you whole heartedly. I would not buy on this info but at the samebangit-1/13/1999
1966 Bangit, notice that while the 100,000 trade is listed on yahoo I don't beligammaray-1/13/1999
1965 I tried wading through the S-1 where the Intel warrants are discussed, but I caKip518-1/13/1999
1964 Bangit: I have been stymied in my attempts to retrieve specific info on the waGreger-1/13/1999
1963 You have a point however the restricted shares could be coming up for unrestricbangit-1/12/1999
1962 <<<THESE ARE OPTIONS BEING SOLD THAT ARE OPTIONS ON RESTRICTED SHgammaray-1/12/1999
1961 Bob, the gap on the opening was quick and dirty. There were not many real buyergammaray-1/12/1999
1960 Sorry I neglected to finish the previous post. No I am not connected to MSH or bangit-1/12/1999
1959 WELL THIS SEEMED TO CAUSE A STIR. A 144 RESTRICTED STOCK SALE WAS POSTED ON Tbangit-1/12/1999
1958 I'm not sure, but I think we compliment that remark! SISSisofsix2-1/12/1999
1957 Peter Sellers would be proud of this board Greger-1/12/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):